Substance use & addiction journal · 2026
Reimagining Methadone Clinics: A Case For Integrating Risk Reduction to Address the Complex Realities of Opioid Use Disorder.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Goswami Mariska, Markus Austen, Shang Margaret, Studnicki Olivia, Ganung Meghan, Wiers Erinn, Tambellini Jess, Glance Jody B, Liebschutz Jane, Jawa Raagini
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Opioid treatment programs (OTPs), the only outpatient settings authorized to dispense methadone for opioid use disorder in the United States, often operate within compliance-focused frameworks that do not reflect the complex realities of substance use or the needs of many patients with the evolving opioid crisis. Given their unique infrastructure, OTPs are well-positioned to provide risk reduction services including naloxone, wound care supplies, and other safer use tools.
OBJECTIVES: Describe the implementation and early outcomes of a pragmatic pilot program integrating safer use kit distribution within a large OTP in Western Pennsylvania.
METHODS: Our team worked with the OTP to develop a workflow for safer use kit distribution. Staff offered interested patients a menu of safer use kits from which they could select up to one of each kit type. Prepackaged kits included fentanyl/xylazine test strips and safer injection, smoking, snorting, and wound care supplies. Kit distribution was tracked over a thirteen-month period. Postimplementation, we sampled patient-facing OTP staff on their perspectives of the program.
RESULTS: From November 2024 to November 2025, 643 kits were distributed during 266 encounters with 142 unique patients. High-demand items included test strips and safer smoking kits. Staff reported improved patient engagement, reduced stigma, and stronger therapeutic relationships after implementing on-site kits.
CONCLUSION: Integrating safer use kits into OTPs is both feasible and impactful, demonstrating consistent patient uptake and positive staff perceptions. These findings suggest such models have the potential to support more inclusive, patient-centered care, though future research is needed to determine downstream effects on retention, safety, and clinical outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: Describe the implementation and early outcomes of a pragmatic pilot program integrating safer use kit distribution within a large OTP in Western Pennsylvania.
METHODS: Our team worked with the OTP to develop a workflow for safer use kit distribution. Staff offered interested patients a menu of safer use kits from which they could select up to one of each kit type. Prepackaged kits included fentanyl/xylazine test strips and safer injection, smoking, snorting, and wound care supplies. Kit distribution was tracked over a thirteen-month period. Postimplementation, we sampled patient-facing OTP staff on their perspectives of the program.
RESULTS: From November 2024 to November 2025, 643 kits were distributed during 266 encounters with 142 unique patients. High-demand items included test strips and safer smoking kits. Staff reported improved patient engagement, reduced stigma, and stronger therapeutic relationships after implementing on-site kits.
CONCLUSION: Integrating safer use kits into OTPs is both feasible and impactful, demonstrating consistent patient uptake and positive staff perceptions. These findings suggest such models have the potential to support more inclusive, patient-centered care, though future research is needed to determine downstream effects on retention, safety, and clinical outcomes.