Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022
The Value of Emergency Nursing Mode in the Treatment of Patients with Traumatic Shock.
Источник пометил эту публикацию как отозванную.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАОтозванная публикацияНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Xu Jinmei, Zhou Xueying, Wang Chunying, Hu Jianli
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To study the value of emergency nursing mode in patients with traumatic shock.
METHODS: 76 patients with traumatic shock in our hospital from March 2019 to February 2021 were selected and divided into study group and control group according to different rescue modes, 38 cases in each group. The study group adopted emergency nursing mode for rescue, while the control group adopted routine nursing mode for rescue. The rescue intervention, emergency stay and preoperative preparation time, rescue success rate, emergency rescue effect, complications, and satisfaction rate of patients and their families for rescue were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: The rescue intervention, emergency stay and preoperative preparation time of the study group were significantly shorter than those of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The rescue success rate of the study group was 97.37%, which was significantly higher than 84.21% of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The improvement rate of the study group was significantly higher than that of the control group, the disability rate was significantly lower than that of the control group, the overall emergency rescue effect was better than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The incidence of complications in the study group was 2.63%, which was significantly lower than 23.68% in the control group (P < 0.05). The satisfaction rate of patients and their families in the study group was 97.37%, which was significantly higher than 84.21% in the control group (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Emergency nursing mode in patients with traumatic shock owns higher rescue value, can buy time for the operation, improve the success rate and effect of rescue, make safety and satisfaction higher. Overall, for patients with traumatic shock, emergency nursing mode is better than conventional rescue nursing.
METHODS: 76 patients with traumatic shock in our hospital from March 2019 to February 2021 were selected and divided into study group and control group according to different rescue modes, 38 cases in each group. The study group adopted emergency nursing mode for rescue, while the control group adopted routine nursing mode for rescue. The rescue intervention, emergency stay and preoperative preparation time, rescue success rate, emergency rescue effect, complications, and satisfaction rate of patients and their families for rescue were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: The rescue intervention, emergency stay and preoperative preparation time of the study group were significantly shorter than those of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The rescue success rate of the study group was 97.37%, which was significantly higher than 84.21% of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The improvement rate of the study group was significantly higher than that of the control group, the disability rate was significantly lower than that of the control group, the overall emergency rescue effect was better than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The incidence of complications in the study group was 2.63%, which was significantly lower than 23.68% in the control group (P < 0.05). The satisfaction rate of patients and their families in the study group was 97.37%, which was significantly higher than 84.21% in the control group (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Emergency nursing mode in patients with traumatic shock owns higher rescue value, can buy time for the operation, improve the success rate and effect of rescue, make safety and satisfaction higher. Overall, for patients with traumatic shock, emergency nursing mode is better than conventional rescue nursing.