MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jinf.2007.11.007

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of infection · 2007

Streptococcus agalactiae in pregnant women: phenotypic and genotypic characters.

Savoia D, Gottimer C, Crocilla' C, Zucca M

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Streptococcus agalactiae (GBS) is considered a leading cause of neonatal sepsis. We evaluated the phenotypic and genotypic characters of 73 S. agalactiae strains isolated from different women at the 35-37 weeks of pregnancy.

METHODS

Isolates were characterized by serotyping (direct agglutination) and by pulsed-field-gel-electrophoresis (PFGE). Resistance to antimicrobials (penicillin, macrolides, lincosamides, quinolones and tetracyclines) was assessed.

RESULTS

All isolates were serologically typeable and ascribable to one of the six tested serotypes (Ia, Ib, II, III, IV, and V) and many strains of the same serotype were genetically heterogeneous. Strains belonging to serotypes III, V and Ia were the most prevalent and the most resistant to macrolides.

CONCLUSIONS

This work reports GBS colonization rate (about 18%) and the prevalent capsular serotypes among pregnant women in Turin (Italy). Penicillin and erythromycin can be still considered the first and second choice drugs for prophylaxis and treatment of early-onset GBS infections in our district. The relevance of phenotypic and genotypic characterization of strains to monitor and control Streptococcus agalactiae infections is briefly discussed.

Для цитирования: Savoia D, Gottimer C, Crocilla' C, Zucca M. Streptococcus agalactiae in pregnant women: phenotypic and genotypic characters.. The Journal of infection. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2007.11.007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.