PloS one · 2025
DNA methylation differences stratified by normalized fetal/placental weight ratios suggest neurodevelopmental deficits in neonates with congenital heart disease.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jacobwitz Marin, Xie Michael, Catalano Jamie, Helbig Ingo, Gaynor J William, Burnham Nancy, Linn Rebecca L, Gebb Juliana, Russell Mark W, Hakonarson Hakon, Chaiyachati Barbara H, Cristancho Ana G
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We lack early biomarkers for predicting neurodevelopment (ND) outcomes in children with congenital heart disease (CHD). Placentas of fetuses with CHD have abnormalities, including unbalanced fetal/placental weight ratios (F/P). Although DNA methylation profiles have revealed insights into the maternal-fetal environment (MFE), it is unknown if DNA methylation correlates to normalized F/P weight ratio groups and how these differences relate to ND outcomes.
METHODS: We prospectively recruited a cohort of pregnant women carrying a fetus with CHD. A subset of the cohort had DNA methylation performed on either umbilical cord blood or postnatal blood (45 full-term neonates). We calculated normalized F/P weight ratios, focusing on three normalized F/P ratio groups for analysis. We calculated differential methylation signals in eight ND disabilities-associated gene sets. Normalized F/P ratios were compared to 18-month Bayley Scales of Infant Development-III scores (BSID-III).
RESULTS: Unbiased gene ontology enrichment analysis of differentially methylated regions revealed enrichment for brain development-related pathways. Although there were no significant differences between normalized F/P weight ratio groups and BSID-III, disease-associated gene set pathway analysis revealed significant methylation differences between the most severely unbalanced F/P weight ratio and normal F/P weight ratio groups.
CONCLUSION: Gene ontology enrichment analysis of differential methylation regions revealed significant differences between normalized F/P weight ratio groups in neurogenesis genes. Furthermore, our data identified methylation differences between unbalanced and balanced normalized F/P weight ratio groups in gene pathways associated with ND dysfunction common in the aging CHD population suggesting converging pathways for ND disorders that should be investigated further.
METHODS: We prospectively recruited a cohort of pregnant women carrying a fetus with CHD. A subset of the cohort had DNA methylation performed on either umbilical cord blood or postnatal blood (45 full-term neonates). We calculated normalized F/P weight ratios, focusing on three normalized F/P ratio groups for analysis. We calculated differential methylation signals in eight ND disabilities-associated gene sets. Normalized F/P ratios were compared to 18-month Bayley Scales of Infant Development-III scores (BSID-III).
RESULTS: Unbiased gene ontology enrichment analysis of differentially methylated regions revealed enrichment for brain development-related pathways. Although there were no significant differences between normalized F/P weight ratio groups and BSID-III, disease-associated gene set pathway analysis revealed significant methylation differences between the most severely unbalanced F/P weight ratio and normal F/P weight ratio groups.
CONCLUSION: Gene ontology enrichment analysis of differential methylation regions revealed significant differences between normalized F/P weight ratio groups in neurogenesis genes. Furthermore, our data identified methylation differences between unbalanced and balanced normalized F/P weight ratio groups in gene pathways associated with ND dysfunction common in the aging CHD population suggesting converging pathways for ND disorders that should be investigated further.