Druggable Targets for Pelvic Inflammatory Disease: Mendelian Randomization and Experimental Validation.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) is a common gynecological disorder that seriously affects women's physical and mental health, yet there are few effective therapeutic options.
OBJECTIVE
Mendelian randomization (MR) has been used to repurpose existing drugs and identify new therapeutic targets. Therefore, we performed a systematic drugable genome-wide MR analysis to explore potential therapeutic targets for PID.
METHODS
We utilized cis-expressed quantitative trait loci (cis-eQTL) of druggable genes and PID Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) data to perform MR analysis and colocalization analysis, screened candidate drugs through drug prediction, identified the most stable druggable genes with the highest binding affinity through molecular docking, and finally constructed a PID rat model to validate gene expression.
RESULTS
MR analysis, colocalization analysis, and protein interaction analysis identified six key genes. Drug enrichment analysis and molecular docking revealed two potential drugs (Sunitinib and Everolimus) targeting Albumin (ALB), Interleukin 6 (IL6), and Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4). In the PID rat model, ALB and IL6 expression decreased, while CD4 expression increased.
CONCLUSION
Our MR analysis provides genetic evidence supporting ALB, IL6, and CD4 as druggable genes for PID treatment. Among the drug candidates with repurposing opportunities targeting the above genes, Sunitinib and Everolimus were effective. Subsequent in vivo experiments validated the differential expression of ALB, IL6, and CD4 in PID rats.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.