International urogynecology journal · 2012
Endoanal ultrasound for detection of sphincter defects following childbirth.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Corton Marlene M, McIntire Donald D, Twickler Diane M, Atnip Shanna, Schaffer Joseph I, Leveno Kenneth J
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objectives of this study were to estimate the rates of sonographically detected anal sphincter defects within 72 h of childbirth and to evaluate intra- and interobserver agreement using three-dimensional (3-D) endoanal sonography data.
METHODS: This is a prospective observational study of primiparous women delivered vaginally. Women without clinically identified anal sphincter lacerations underwent endoanal ultrasonography within 72 h of delivery. Intra- and interobserver agreement for diagnosis of sphincter defects using 3-D endoanal sonography data was calculated using kappa statistics.
RESULTS: The rate of sphincter defects in 107 women undergoing 3-D endoanal sonography was 12 %. Characteristics of women with sonographically detected sphincter defects, compared to those without, included a significantly increased rate of clinically diagnosed second-degree lacerations (54 vs 20 %, p 0.008). The intra- and interobserver agreement for diagnosis of sphincter defects using 3-D endoanal sonography data was 0.82 [confidence interval (CI) 0.66-0.99] and 0.72 (CI 0.54-0.92), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Anal sphincter defects detected using endoanal sonography are common, occurring in 12 % of primiparous women, and are significantly associated with other less severe perineal lacerations. Overall and combining sonographically detected defects with clinically diagnosed lacerations, we estimate that 17.8 % of primiparous women delivered vaginally sustain anal sphincter injuries. The intraobserver agreement for diagnosis of sphincter defects is very good and the interobserver agreement is good.
METHODS: This is a prospective observational study of primiparous women delivered vaginally. Women without clinically identified anal sphincter lacerations underwent endoanal ultrasonography within 72 h of delivery. Intra- and interobserver agreement for diagnosis of sphincter defects using 3-D endoanal sonography data was calculated using kappa statistics.
RESULTS: The rate of sphincter defects in 107 women undergoing 3-D endoanal sonography was 12 %. Characteristics of women with sonographically detected sphincter defects, compared to those without, included a significantly increased rate of clinically diagnosed second-degree lacerations (54 vs 20 %, p 0.008). The intra- and interobserver agreement for diagnosis of sphincter defects using 3-D endoanal sonography data was 0.82 [confidence interval (CI) 0.66-0.99] and 0.72 (CI 0.54-0.92), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Anal sphincter defects detected using endoanal sonography are common, occurring in 12 % of primiparous women, and are significantly associated with other less severe perineal lacerations. Overall and combining sonographically detected defects with clinically diagnosed lacerations, we estimate that 17.8 % of primiparous women delivered vaginally sustain anal sphincter injuries. The intraobserver agreement for diagnosis of sphincter defects is very good and the interobserver agreement is good.