MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.10.113

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2015

Long-term survival, valve durability, and reoperation for 4 aortic root procedures combined with ascending aorta replacement.

Svensson Lars G, Pillai Saila T, Rajeswaran Jeevanantham, Desai Milind Y, Griffin Brian, Grimm Richard, Hammer Donald F, Thamilarasan Maran, Roselli Eric E, Pettersson Gösta B, Gillinov A Marc, Navia Jose L, Smedira Nicholas G, Sabik Joseph F, Lytle Bruce W, Blackstone Eugene H

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАVideo-Audio MediaПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate long-term results of aortic root procedures combined with ascending aorta replacement for aneurysms, using 4 surgical strategies.

METHODS

From January 1995 to January 2011, 957 patients underwent 1 of 4 aortic root procedures: valve preservation (remodeling or modified reimplantation, n = 261); composite biologic graft (n = 297); composite mechanical graft (n = 156); or allograft root (n = 243).

RESULTS

Seven deaths occurred (0.73%), none after valve-preserving procedures, and 13 strokes (1.4%). Composite grafts exhibited higher gradients than allografts or valve preservation, but the latter 2 exhibited more aortic regurgitation (2.7% biologic and 0% mechanical composite grafts vs 24% valve-preserving and 19% allografts at 10 years). Within 2 to 5 years, valve preservation exhibited the least left ventricular hypertrophy, allograft replacement the greatest; however, valve preservation had the highest early risk of reoperation, allograft replacement the lowest. Patients receiving allografts had the highest risk of late reoperation (P < .05), and those receiving composite mechanical grafts and valve preservation had the lowest. Composite bioprosthesis patients had the highest risk of late death (57% at 15 years vs 14%-26% for the remaining procedures, P < .0001), because they were substantially older and had more comorbidities (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

These 4 aortic root procedures, combined with ascending aorta replacement, provide excellent survival and good durability. Valve-preserving and allograft procedures have the lowest gradients and best ventricular remodeling, but they have more late regurgitation, and likely, less risk of valve-related complications, such as bleeding, hemorrhage, and endocarditis. Despite the early risk of reoperation, we recommend valve-preserving procedures for young patients when possible. Composite bioprostheses are preferable for the elderly.

Для цитирования: Svensson Lars G, Pillai Saila T, Rajeswaran Jeevanantham, Desai Milind Y, Griffin Brian, Grimm Richard, Hammer Donald F, Thamilarasan Maran, Roselli Eric E, Pettersson Gösta B, Gillinov A Marc, Navia Jose L, Smedira Nicholas G, Sabik Joseph F, Lytle Bruce W, Blackstone Eugene H. Long-term survival, valve durability, and reoperation for 4 aortic root procedures combined with ascending aorta replacement.. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.10.113.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.