The Journal of hand surgery · 2014
Little finger carpometacarpal arthroplasty technique and result in 3 cases.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pruzansky Jason S, Goljan Peter, Bachoura Abdo, Jacoby Sidney M, Culp Randall W
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To present our surgical technique and results for the treatment of posttraumatic arthritis of the little finger carpometacarpal (CMC) joint.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 3 patients who underwent our surgical technique. All patients had previously sustained intra-articular fractures of the base of the little finger metacarpal and presented with painful posttraumatic arthritis of the fifth metacarpal-hamate joint. Patients were treated with little finger CMC arthroplasty and extensor carpi ulnaris suspensionplasty.
RESULTS: We observed the 3 patients in the office over a mean of 21 months and by telephone for a mean for 51 months postoperatively. They had improvements in wrist motion and grip strength. Finger motion remained stable. Pain and tenderness at the little finger CMC joint were eliminated.
CONCLUSIONS: Our technique provided satisfactory pain relief and motion preservation for posttraumatic arthritis of the little finger CMC joint.
TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 3 patients who underwent our surgical technique. All patients had previously sustained intra-articular fractures of the base of the little finger metacarpal and presented with painful posttraumatic arthritis of the fifth metacarpal-hamate joint. Patients were treated with little finger CMC arthroplasty and extensor carpi ulnaris suspensionplasty.
RESULTS: We observed the 3 patients in the office over a mean of 21 months and by telephone for a mean for 51 months postoperatively. They had improvements in wrist motion and grip strength. Finger motion remained stable. Pain and tenderness at the little finger CMC joint were eliminated.
CONCLUSIONS: Our technique provided satisfactory pain relief and motion preservation for posttraumatic arthritis of the little finger CMC joint.
TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.