European journal of paediatric dentistry · 2027
Clinical examination versus DIAGNOcam™ in the evaluation of pits and fissures of first permanent molars: cross-sectional study in paediatric patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Carli E, Izzetti R, Cinquini C, Candreva E, Tognini G, Giuca M R, Ligori S
Аннотация
AIM: This observational study assessed the concordance between clinical examination and DIAGNOcam™ analysis of the occlusal surfaces of first permanent molars in paediatric patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the contribution of this device to clinical decision-making in cases characterised by treatment uncertainty.
METHODS: The first permanent molars of 66 paediatric patients were evaluated during the first dental examination. Each tooth was examined independently by two dentists, experts in paediatric dentistry, the first clinically assessing the teeth through the ICDAS index, and the second using DIAGNOcam™. Teeth were then classified as either "sealable" or "non-sealable". The results obtained from both examinations were recorded and compared.
CONCLUSION: DIAGNOcam™ might be considered a highly effective clinical tool in detecting occlusal demineralisation, although with lower specificity compared to ICDAS. DIAGNOcam™ might therefore integrate but not substitute the clinician's visual examination.
METHODS: The first permanent molars of 66 paediatric patients were evaluated during the first dental examination. Each tooth was examined independently by two dentists, experts in paediatric dentistry, the first clinically assessing the teeth through the ICDAS index, and the second using DIAGNOcam™. Teeth were then classified as either "sealable" or "non-sealable". The results obtained from both examinations were recorded and compared.
CONCLUSION: DIAGNOcam™ might be considered a highly effective clinical tool in detecting occlusal demineralisation, although with lower specificity compared to ICDAS. DIAGNOcam™ might therefore integrate but not substitute the clinician's visual examination.