International urogynecology journal · 2019
Are women with cervical incompetence at a higher risk of experiencing urinary and pelvic organ prolapse symptoms?
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ben-Zvi Masha, Herman Hadas Ganer, Bar Jacob, Condrea Alexander, Ginath Shimon
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTs), in addition to cervical incompetence, have a multifactorial etiology. Connective tissue disorders are common risk factors in both entities. The objective of this study was to compare long-term urinary and pelvic organ prolapse-related symptoms in patients who experienced cervical incompetence and those who did not.
METHODS: In this historical prospective cohort, analysis of cervical incompetence cases from one medical center between 2006 and 2009 were compared with a matched control group. All cases included a minimum 7-year follow-up. Symptoms of urinary and prolapse-related complaints during follow-up were evaluated based on the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 questionnaire.
RESULTS: The study group comprised 37 women who experienced cervical incompetence matched to 34 consecutive controls. There was no difference between the groups in demographic or obstetric characteristics, except for a higher cesarean section rate and earlier deliveries among women with cervical incompetence. On assessment of patient's symptoms, during follow-up, the average Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory-6 score was significantly higher in patients who experienced cervical incompetence than in controls (15.0 ± 26.1 vs 1.7 ± 7.1 respectively, p = 0.034). Urinary complaints, as reflected by the Urinary Distress Inventory-6 index, were also more common in women with cervical incompetence (17.9 ± 19.1 vs 3.9 ± 7.3 p = 0.027).
CONCLUSIONS: Women with a history of cervical incompetence experienced a higher rate of pelvic organ prolapse and urinary symptoms compared with women who had no cervical insufficiency.
METHODS: In this historical prospective cohort, analysis of cervical incompetence cases from one medical center between 2006 and 2009 were compared with a matched control group. All cases included a minimum 7-year follow-up. Symptoms of urinary and prolapse-related complaints during follow-up were evaluated based on the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 questionnaire.
RESULTS: The study group comprised 37 women who experienced cervical incompetence matched to 34 consecutive controls. There was no difference between the groups in demographic or obstetric characteristics, except for a higher cesarean section rate and earlier deliveries among women with cervical incompetence. On assessment of patient's symptoms, during follow-up, the average Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory-6 score was significantly higher in patients who experienced cervical incompetence than in controls (15.0 ± 26.1 vs 1.7 ± 7.1 respectively, p = 0.034). Urinary complaints, as reflected by the Urinary Distress Inventory-6 index, were also more common in women with cervical incompetence (17.9 ± 19.1 vs 3.9 ± 7.3 p = 0.027).
CONCLUSIONS: Women with a history of cervical incompetence experienced a higher rate of pelvic organ prolapse and urinary symptoms compared with women who had no cervical insufficiency.