Journal of oral & maxillofacial research · 2026
One-Abutment-One-Time Versus Repeated Abutments Disconnections in Platform-Switched Conical Connection Dental.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Abayov Pinny, Bangiev Lior, Mizrahi Lir Ben, Bangiyev Nathanel, Gervickas Albinas, Juodžbalys Gintaras
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The one-abutment-one-time protocol has been proposed to improve peri-implant tissue stability by minimizing repeated abutment manipulation. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effect of one-abutment-one-time compared with repeated abutment disconnections on peri-implant marginal bone loss and secondary clinical outcomes in platform-switched, conical-connection dental implants.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A PRISMA-guided systematic review of randomized controlled trials published between 2018 and 2025 was conducted. Studies included adult patients restored with bone-level, platform-switched implants with an internal conical connection. Marginal bone loss (MBL) was the primary outcome; probing depth (PD), implant survival, and biological and prosthetic complications were secondary outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models.
RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials were included. All studies reported numerically lower MBL with one-abutment-one-time (OAOT). Pooled analysis of six parallel-group trials demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in MBL favouring OAOT (mean difference -0.23 mm; 95% CI = -0.44 to -0.02). No significant differences were observed for PD. Implant survival rates were high and comparable between protocols, and complication rates were low with no consistent intergroup differences.
CONCLUSIONS: The one-abutment-one-time protocol is associated with a modest but consistent reduction in peri-implant marginal bone loss in platform-switched, conical-connection implants, without clear benefits for other peri-implant clinical outcomes.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A PRISMA-guided systematic review of randomized controlled trials published between 2018 and 2025 was conducted. Studies included adult patients restored with bone-level, platform-switched implants with an internal conical connection. Marginal bone loss (MBL) was the primary outcome; probing depth (PD), implant survival, and biological and prosthetic complications were secondary outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models.
RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials were included. All studies reported numerically lower MBL with one-abutment-one-time (OAOT). Pooled analysis of six parallel-group trials demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in MBL favouring OAOT (mean difference -0.23 mm; 95% CI = -0.44 to -0.02). No significant differences were observed for PD. Implant survival rates were high and comparable between protocols, and complication rates were low with no consistent intergroup differences.
CONCLUSIONS: The one-abutment-one-time protocol is associated with a modest but consistent reduction in peri-implant marginal bone loss in platform-switched, conical-connection implants, without clear benefits for other peri-implant clinical outcomes.