MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/acem.70002

Медицинская библиотека · Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025

Abortion care in the emergency department: A national survey of emergency physicians' perspectives.

Kempf Abigail M, Singer Miriam R, Haas-Kogan Maetal, Pelletier Andrea, Friedman Ari B, Easter Sarah Rae, Bartz Deborah

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The emergency department (ED) is an essential setting for diagnosis of pregnancy, confirmation of pregnancy location, and management of pregnancy loss and other complications. This health care service delivery is especially important for patients with limited or complicated access into reproductive health care elsewhere. We seek to assess emergency physicians' knowledge, training, attitudes, and practices related to pregnancy options counseling, reproductive health referrals, and provision of medical- and procedural-induced abortion.

METHODS

We surveyed a sample of emergency physicians in person at a U.S. national medical meeting regarding knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to reproductive health care delivery. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to evaluate differences between abortion-restrictive and -permissive states and chi-square tests were used to compare proportions between the two groups and Wilcoxon signed rank was used to compare median scores between questions. Thematic analysis was used to review qualitative responses.

RESULTS

Of the 295 emergency physicians approached, 252 (85.4%) completed study procedures. The majority (n = 218, 86.5%) practiced in abortion-permissive states. Most (n = 178, 70.6%) supported abortion provision in the ED if legally allowed, though only about half (n = 131, 52.0%) reported ever prescribing medication abortion pills. Despite higher proportions reporting training in services, a small minority responded they could still independently provide pregnancy options counseling (25.1%), direct referrals for abortion (34.9%), medical management for early pregnancy loss (15.1%) or induced abortion (10.7%), or uterine aspiration for any pregnancy indication (1.6%). Training and knowledge were similar, though practice patterns and attitudes differed when comparing abortion-restrictive to -permissive states.

CONCLUSIONS

This national survey demonstrates that, while most emergency physicians support the provision of abortion care in this setting, they do not routinely provide this care due to a variety of factors including lack of knowledge, lack of training, and legal and institutional restrictions.

Для цитирования: Kempf Abigail M, Singer Miriam R, Haas-Kogan Maetal, Pelletier Andrea, Friedman Ari B, Easter Sarah Rae, Bartz Deborah. Abortion care in the emergency department: A national survey of emergency physicians' perspectives.. Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.1111/acem.70002.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.