Comparisons between long-term outcomes of the use of reposition flaps and replantations in fingertip amputations.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Replantation is the gold standard procedure for traumatic amputation of fingertips. Reposition flap procedure is performed using nail-bone complex as a free graft and covering graft site with a flap to preserve original finger length, nail complex, and sensory functions of fingertip in pateints where microsurgical methods cannot be applied. In our study, we aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of patients with amputated fingertips who underwent replantation or reposition flap procedures.
METHODS
Thirty-five patients of replantation and 28 patients of reposition flap procedures only for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th fingertip amputations were included in the study. Complete fingertip amputations involved Foucher zones 2 and 3. The patients were followed up postoperatively for a median period of 13 months (9-23 months). All patients were assessed with static and dynamic 2-point discrimination tests, Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test, and cold intolerance test for the development of neuroma on the donor site.
RESULTS
In 5 patients, replantation procedure failed. In such failed patients, after the removal of necrotic tissues, the stump was either repaired or reconstruction with a flap was applied. Wound dehiscence was observed at the lateral sides of the flaps in 2 patients who underwent reposition procedures.
CONCLUSION
Reposition flap repair can be a good cost-effective alternative to other fingertip repair procedures in appropriately selected patients who are not amenable to microsurgery. It preserves the length and sensory functions of fingertips and enables patients to return to their daily life as soon as possible.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.