Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU · 2005
Tubular ectasia of the epididymis: a sign of postvasectomy status.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ishigami Kousei, Abu-Yousef Monzer M, El-Zein Yousef
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To find out if "tubular ectasia of the epididymis" is suggestive of postvasectomy status.
METHODS: Tubular ectasia of the epididymis is defined as enlargement of the epididymis with multiple interfaces (i.e., a speckled appearance). We found 24 cases exhibiting tubular ectasia of the epididymis over a period of six years. We reviewed the sonographic findings of tubular ectasia of the epididymis and evaluated the prevalence of associated findings.
RESULTS: In 24 patients with tubular ectasia of the epididymis, 16 cases were bilateral, five were right-sided, and three were left-sided. Twenty-one patients had history of vasectomy, of the three remaining cases, 1 had history of inguinal hernia repair, one had prostatitis, and one had undetermined etiology. Associated abnormalities included dilated vas deferens (n = 4), tubular ectasia of the testis (n = 2), large spermatoceles (n = 6), hydrocele (n = 3), and varicocele (n = 4). In 2 cases, spermatic granulomas were suspected.
CONCLUSION: Tubular ectasia of the epididymis is suggestive of postvasectomy epididymis. This sonographic feature is helpful in evaluating a patient with scrotal discomfort. However, this sign can also be associated with other causes of vas obstruction.
METHODS: Tubular ectasia of the epididymis is defined as enlargement of the epididymis with multiple interfaces (i.e., a speckled appearance). We found 24 cases exhibiting tubular ectasia of the epididymis over a period of six years. We reviewed the sonographic findings of tubular ectasia of the epididymis and evaluated the prevalence of associated findings.
RESULTS: In 24 patients with tubular ectasia of the epididymis, 16 cases were bilateral, five were right-sided, and three were left-sided. Twenty-one patients had history of vasectomy, of the three remaining cases, 1 had history of inguinal hernia repair, one had prostatitis, and one had undetermined etiology. Associated abnormalities included dilated vas deferens (n = 4), tubular ectasia of the testis (n = 2), large spermatoceles (n = 6), hydrocele (n = 3), and varicocele (n = 4). In 2 cases, spermatic granulomas were suspected.
CONCLUSION: Tubular ectasia of the epididymis is suggestive of postvasectomy epididymis. This sonographic feature is helpful in evaluating a patient with scrotal discomfort. However, this sign can also be associated with other causes of vas obstruction.