Archivos espanoles de urologia · 1997
[Should one perform supravesical urinary diversions with excluded bladder in patients with cancer?].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Granados E A, Salvador J, Villavicencio H, Vicente J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To review our experience in 37 patients who had undergone supravesical urinary diversion with defunctionalized bladder left in situ.
METHODS: The pathological conditions that indicated surgery were advanced infiltrating bladder carcinoma and bladder irradiation due to other pelvic organ malignancies.
RESULTS: The analysis showed 70.25% of the patients had complications, the most common being hemorrhage (27.07%), followed by pyocyst (13.51%). Four patients (10.81%) required rehospitalization for treatment of complications. The patients were treated with a combination of parenteral antibiotics and continuous bladder irrigations using a variety of antiseptic solutions. One patient required a permanent cystostomy.
CONCLUSION: There is a need to evaluate the benefit of the supravesical urinary diversion with defunctionalized bladder left in situ in patients with advanced infiltrating bladder carcinoma and bladder irradiation due to other pelvic organ malignancies. The type of diversion is unrelated to the complications that develop in the defunctionalized bladder. Patients with positive urine cultures and/or urethral stricture preoperatively have an increased risk of developing pyocyst.
METHODS: The pathological conditions that indicated surgery were advanced infiltrating bladder carcinoma and bladder irradiation due to other pelvic organ malignancies.
RESULTS: The analysis showed 70.25% of the patients had complications, the most common being hemorrhage (27.07%), followed by pyocyst (13.51%). Four patients (10.81%) required rehospitalization for treatment of complications. The patients were treated with a combination of parenteral antibiotics and continuous bladder irrigations using a variety of antiseptic solutions. One patient required a permanent cystostomy.
CONCLUSION: There is a need to evaluate the benefit of the supravesical urinary diversion with defunctionalized bladder left in situ in patients with advanced infiltrating bladder carcinoma and bladder irradiation due to other pelvic organ malignancies. The type of diversion is unrelated to the complications that develop in the defunctionalized bladder. Patients with positive urine cultures and/or urethral stricture preoperatively have an increased risk of developing pyocyst.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCutaneous FistulaCystitisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessPainPelvic NeoplasmsPostoperative ComplicationsRadiation InjuriesRadioisotope TeletherapyRetrospective StudiesUrethral StrictureUrinary BladderUrinary Bladder DiseasesUrinary Bladder FistulaUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrinary DiversionUrinary Tract Infections