Journal of substance use and addiction treatment · 2024
Exploring racial and secondary substance use differences in route of administration of opioid drugs: Analysis of the 2015-2019 treatment admission data.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gilbert Lauren R, Tawiah Nii A, Adepoju Omolola E
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The opioid crisis continues to evolve with increasing opioid-related overdose deaths among under-represented minorities. A better understanding of substance use differences in the route of administration for people using heroin and other opioids can lead to targeted strategies and interventions.
METHODS: Using the 2015-2019 Treatment Episode Data Set - Admissions (TEDS-A), a multinomial logistic regression model examined the relationship between race/ethnicity and secondary substance use with route of administration in a subset of 591,078 admissions.
RESULTS: For individuals reporting heroin as their primary substance, minoritized clients were both more likely to smoke (NH Blacks RR: 2.28, 95 % CI 2.16-2.41; Hispanic RR: 1.80, 95 % CI: 1.74, 1.87; Other RR: 2.09, 95 % CI: 2.00, 2.20) or inhale heroin (Hispanic RR: 1.82, 95 % CI 1.78-1.85; Other RR: 1.30, 95 % CI 1.25, 1.34) compared to non-Hispanic (NH) Whites. NH Black clients were nearly seven and a half times more likely to report inhaling (RR: 7.45, 95 % CI 7.28, 7.62) heroin over injecting it. Clients were more likely to smoke heroin compared to injection if they reported secondary drug use of methamphetamines (RR: 2.28, 95 % CI 2.21, 2.35) and other opioids (RR: 1.21, 95 % CI 1.15, 1.28). For clients reporting other opioids as their primary substance, Hispanic (RR: 1.33, 95 % CI 1.19, 1.47) and other racial/ethnic minority clients (RR: 2.50, 95 % CI 2.23, 2.79) were more likely to smoke opioids vs take it orally compared to their NH White counterparts. Individuals who reported methamphetamine use as a secondary substance were significantly more than three times as likely to smoke (RR: 3.07, 95 % CI 2.74, 3.45) or inject (RR: 3.36, 95 % CI 3.17, 3.57) compared to orally ingesting opioids, while those who reported cocaine or crack cocaine use were more than twice as likely to inject (RR: 2.22, 95 % CI 2.09-2.36) opioids than taking them orally.
CONCLUSION: Findings demonstrate significant racial and ethnic differences in the route of administration. This work expands on the understanding of the complex nature of polysubstance use in the evolving opioid crisis and the secondary substance use of clients on routes of administration of opioids and heroin, highlighting the need for tailored interventions to address the treatment needs of under-represented minorities.
METHODS: Using the 2015-2019 Treatment Episode Data Set - Admissions (TEDS-A), a multinomial logistic regression model examined the relationship between race/ethnicity and secondary substance use with route of administration in a subset of 591,078 admissions.
RESULTS: For individuals reporting heroin as their primary substance, minoritized clients were both more likely to smoke (NH Blacks RR: 2.28, 95 % CI 2.16-2.41; Hispanic RR: 1.80, 95 % CI: 1.74, 1.87; Other RR: 2.09, 95 % CI: 2.00, 2.20) or inhale heroin (Hispanic RR: 1.82, 95 % CI 1.78-1.85; Other RR: 1.30, 95 % CI 1.25, 1.34) compared to non-Hispanic (NH) Whites. NH Black clients were nearly seven and a half times more likely to report inhaling (RR: 7.45, 95 % CI 7.28, 7.62) heroin over injecting it. Clients were more likely to smoke heroin compared to injection if they reported secondary drug use of methamphetamines (RR: 2.28, 95 % CI 2.21, 2.35) and other opioids (RR: 1.21, 95 % CI 1.15, 1.28). For clients reporting other opioids as their primary substance, Hispanic (RR: 1.33, 95 % CI 1.19, 1.47) and other racial/ethnic minority clients (RR: 2.50, 95 % CI 2.23, 2.79) were more likely to smoke opioids vs take it orally compared to their NH White counterparts. Individuals who reported methamphetamine use as a secondary substance were significantly more than three times as likely to smoke (RR: 3.07, 95 % CI 2.74, 3.45) or inject (RR: 3.36, 95 % CI 3.17, 3.57) compared to orally ingesting opioids, while those who reported cocaine or crack cocaine use were more than twice as likely to inject (RR: 2.22, 95 % CI 2.09-2.36) opioids than taking them orally.
CONCLUSION: Findings demonstrate significant racial and ethnic differences in the route of administration. This work expands on the understanding of the complex nature of polysubstance use in the evolving opioid crisis and the secondary substance use of clients on routes of administration of opioids and heroin, highlighting the need for tailored interventions to address the treatment needs of under-represented minorities.