Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis · 2021
ABO antibody titer performance characteristics and correlates between two automated platforms.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Corean Jessica, Gilsdorf Jonella, Sauter Jessi, Pamukcu Pette, Thorpe Steve, Pham Tho
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: AABB standards require a policy for assessing transfusing ABO-incompatible plasma. After a fatal hemolytic event with incompatible plasma, our institution instituted platelet donor population titer method for ABO antibodies on the PK7300, with high-titer being defined as having isohemagglutinin titers greater than 256. We recently switched titering platforms to the Neo Iris and we seek to determine the equivalent isohemagglutinin high-titer cutoff on the Neo Iris as compared to the PK7300.
METHODS: We measured the titers on 299 apheresis platelet donors and compared its performance characteristics at various cutoffs to the PK7300 reference standard. Discrepant results were manually diluted and retested on the Neo Galileo. Furthermore, since the Neo Iris is able to determine isotype and antigen specific titers, we also characterized these features in our donor population.
RESULTS: IgM titer of 128 on the Neo Iris has better accuracy compared to the titer of 64 (94 % vs 93.6 %). Eleven of sixteen discordant results were in agreement with Neo Iris. Blood group O had the highest IgG antibody titers for both anti-A and anti-B (p = 8.4E-17 and 4.3E-09, respectively). Additionally, group O donors exhibited lower anti-A2 than anti-A1 IgG titers.
DISCUSSION: The Neo Iris titer cut-off of 128 had the best overall accuracy and correlation with a 256 cut-off on our laboratory developed test on the PK7300 platform. Additionally, we found that group O donors had the highest titer antibodies, with typically higher IgG titers than IgM, and generally multiple dilution levels greater than other blood types.
METHODS: We measured the titers on 299 apheresis platelet donors and compared its performance characteristics at various cutoffs to the PK7300 reference standard. Discrepant results were manually diluted and retested on the Neo Galileo. Furthermore, since the Neo Iris is able to determine isotype and antigen specific titers, we also characterized these features in our donor population.
RESULTS: IgM titer of 128 on the Neo Iris has better accuracy compared to the titer of 64 (94 % vs 93.6 %). Eleven of sixteen discordant results were in agreement with Neo Iris. Blood group O had the highest IgG antibody titers for both anti-A and anti-B (p = 8.4E-17 and 4.3E-09, respectively). Additionally, group O donors exhibited lower anti-A2 than anti-A1 IgG titers.
DISCUSSION: The Neo Iris titer cut-off of 128 had the best overall accuracy and correlation with a 256 cut-off on our laboratory developed test on the PK7300 platform. Additionally, we found that group O donors had the highest titer antibodies, with typically higher IgG titers than IgM, and generally multiple dilution levels greater than other blood types.