Incidence and associations of painful neuroma in a contemporary cohort of lower-limb amputees.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The painful post amputation neuroma significantly impairs the prosthesis-wearing lower-limb amputee. It remains poorly understood, with literature limited to cohorts of traumatic amputees. This paper reports the incidence and associations of painful neuroma in a modern tertiary centre with a case load of amputations performed for both traumatic and non-traumatic indications.
METHOD: This retrospective cohort study analysed the records of 304 patients who underwent all-cause lower-limb amputation at The Alfred Hospital between January 2002 and March 2012. Patients were included in our analysis if they completed 1-year follow-up at our Amputee Rehabilitation Clinic, producing a final cohort of 96 patients. In order to identify a painful neuroma post-operatively, both clinical suspicion, and either histopathological or radiological evidence were required.
RESULTS
The overall incidence of symptomatic neuromas was 4.17%. There was no significant difference between patients who underwent amputation for a traumatic indication (6.25% (2/32) versus 3.13% (2/64); P = 0.59) compared to non-traumatic indication (P = 0.59). Visual analogue score at discharge and the presence of phantom limb pain at follow-up showed significant associations with the formation of painful neuroma. Dose of opioid on discharge, history of depression and current smoking did not reach statistical significance.
CONCLUSION
This study presents a lower incidence of painful post-amputation neuroma to those published in the literature. This may be attributed to improved methodology. The described associations require further investigation into central factors leading to neuroma sensitization.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.