Cureus · 2026
Conventional and Basal Implantology: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence, Clinical Decision-Making, and Future Perspectives.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Joshi Megha, Kaushik Mayur, Rana Mohd Nazar, Kaushik Soumya
Аннотация
Dental implantology has transformed tooth replacement by offering reliable, functional, and aesthetic solutions. Conventional implants rely on adequate alveolar bone and often require staged procedures with delayed loading. They come in various designs with surface treatments to enhance osseointegration. Basal implants, in contrast, anchor into the dense cortical bone, enabling immediate loading without bone grafting. These single-piece implants have polished surfaces to reduce infection and require minimal surgical intervention. While basal implants offer faster treatment and are suitable for severe bone loss or compromised patients, they need expert handling and may be less aesthetic for single teeth. Both implant types have distinct roles in modern implant dentistry, addressing diverse clinical needs. The article provides a comprehensive overview of the evolving landscape of dental implantology, highlighting the contrasting principles and applications of cortical and cancellous implants.