Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026
Complications of catheter-directed interventions in acute pulmonary embolism: a narrative expert review with guidance on management.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
García-Martí Gonzalo, Velázquez Martín Maite, Maneiro Melón Nicolás, Salinas Pablo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Catheter-directed interventions (CDI) for pulmonary embolism (PE) have emerged as alternatives to systemic thrombolysis for patients requiring reperfusion, enabling thrombus burden reduction through low-dose local thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy. Despite encouraging hemodynamic and clinical outcomes, procedure-specific complications are poorly characterized in the literature. This narrative review aims to synthesize the reported complications of CDI in acute PE and provide practical management strategies.
METHODS: A PubMed search covering 2014-2025, limited to articles published in English or Spanish, complemented by reference screening, identified randomized clinical trials and prospective or retrospective registries of CDI in acute PE reporting safety outcomes. These studies were used to construct a comprehensive overview of CDI-related complications, while additional registries, case reports, and case series were examined to describe rare events not captured by primary studies, as well as expert insights when evidence was insufficient or unavailable.
KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: Complications of CDI in acute PE encompass a broad and heterogeneous spectrum including access-site complications, right-heart injury, pulmonary arterial lesions, catheter malfunction and mechanical complications, and hemodynamic deterioration. Their incidence varies considerably across studies, and the absence of standardized definitions or classifications limits accurate assessment of the true frequency and clinical impact of those adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the available evidence, this narrative expert review examines the spectrum of CDI-related complications in acute PE. It seeks to bridge the gap between innovation and safety by equipping clinicians and interventionalists with practical guidance for the recognition, prevention, and management of these adverse events.
METHODS: A PubMed search covering 2014-2025, limited to articles published in English or Spanish, complemented by reference screening, identified randomized clinical trials and prospective or retrospective registries of CDI in acute PE reporting safety outcomes. These studies were used to construct a comprehensive overview of CDI-related complications, while additional registries, case reports, and case series were examined to describe rare events not captured by primary studies, as well as expert insights when evidence was insufficient or unavailable.
KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: Complications of CDI in acute PE encompass a broad and heterogeneous spectrum including access-site complications, right-heart injury, pulmonary arterial lesions, catheter malfunction and mechanical complications, and hemodynamic deterioration. Their incidence varies considerably across studies, and the absence of standardized definitions or classifications limits accurate assessment of the true frequency and clinical impact of those adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the available evidence, this narrative expert review examines the spectrum of CDI-related complications in acute PE. It seeks to bridge the gap between innovation and safety by equipping clinicians and interventionalists with practical guidance for the recognition, prevention, and management of these adverse events.