Injury · 2013
A paradigm shift in the surgical reconstruction of extra-articular distal humeral fractures: single-column plating.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Meloy Gregory M, Mormino Matthew A, Siska Peter A, Tarkin Ivan S
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The study aimed (1) to examine if there are equivalent results in terms of union, alignment and elbow functionally comparing single- to dual-column plating of AO/OTA 13A2 and A3 distal humeral fractures and (2) if there are more implant-related complications in patients managed with bicolumnar plating compared to single-column plate fixation.
DESIGN: This was a multi-centred retrospective comparative study.
SETTING: The study was conducted at two academic level 1 trauma centres.
PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 105 patients were identified to have surgical management of extra-articular distal humeral fractures Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) 13A2 and AO/OTA 13A3).
INTERVENTION: Patients were treated with traditional dual-column plating or a single-column posterolateral small-fragment pre-contoured locking plate used as a neutralisation device with at least five screws in the short distal segment.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The patients' elbow functionality was assessed in terms of range of motion, union and alignment. In addition, the rate of complications between the groups including radial nerve palsy, implant-related complications (painful prominence and/or ulnar nerve neuritis) and elbow stiffness were compared.
RESULTS: Patients treated with single-column plating had similar union rates and alignment. However, single-column plating resulted in a significantly better range of motion with less complications.
CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggests that exposure/instrumentation of only the lateral column is a reliable and preferred technique. This technique allows for comparable union rates and alignment with increased elbow functionality and decreased number of complications.
DESIGN: This was a multi-centred retrospective comparative study.
SETTING: The study was conducted at two academic level 1 trauma centres.
PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 105 patients were identified to have surgical management of extra-articular distal humeral fractures Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) 13A2 and AO/OTA 13A3).
INTERVENTION: Patients were treated with traditional dual-column plating or a single-column posterolateral small-fragment pre-contoured locking plate used as a neutralisation device with at least five screws in the short distal segment.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The patients' elbow functionality was assessed in terms of range of motion, union and alignment. In addition, the rate of complications between the groups including radial nerve palsy, implant-related complications (painful prominence and/or ulnar nerve neuritis) and elbow stiffness were compared.
RESULTS: Patients treated with single-column plating had similar union rates and alignment. However, single-column plating resulted in a significantly better range of motion with less complications.
CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggests that exposure/instrumentation of only the lateral column is a reliable and preferred technique. This technique allows for comparable union rates and alignment with increased elbow functionality and decreased number of complications.