International journal of cardiology · 2017
Systemic application of sirolimus prevents neointima formation not via a direct anti-proliferative effect but via its anti-inflammatory properties.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Daniel Jan-Marcus, Dutzmann Jochen, Brunsch Hannes, Bauersachs Johann, Braun-Dullaeus Rüdiger, Sedding Daniel G
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Systemic treatment with sirolimus, as used for immunosuppression in transplant patients, results in markedly low rates of in-stent restenosis. Since the underlying mechanisms remain obscure, we aimed to determine the molecular and cellular effects of systemic sirolimus treatment on vascular remodeling processes.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Systemic sirolimus treatment significantly reduced smooth muscle cell (SMC) proliferation 14days after wire-induced injury and neointima formation 28days after injury in C57BL/6 mice, while simultaneously impairing re-endothelialization. Interestingly, in vitro, sirolimus had no direct effect on the proliferation of SMC or endothelial cells (EC) at serum concentrations observed after systemic application. In contrast, sirolimus reduced the adhesion of leukocytes (CD45+) and bone marrow-derived progenitor cells (CD34+) to activated EC by down-regulating the adhesion molecules ICAM-1 and VCAM-1. In addition, sirolimus treatment also significantly reduced the upregulation of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 and the recruitment of monocytic cells (MOMA-2+) in neointimal lesions in vivo.
CONCLUSION: Our findings show that systemic sirolimus treatment effectively prevents SMC and EC proliferation in vivo without directly affecting these cells. Instead, sirolimus prevents neointima formation and re-endothelialization by attenuating the inflammatory response after injury with secondary effects on SMC and EC proliferation. Thus, despite a similar net effect, the mechanisms of systemic sirolimus treatment are largely different from the local effects achieved after application of sirolimus-eluting stents.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Systemic sirolimus treatment significantly reduced smooth muscle cell (SMC) proliferation 14days after wire-induced injury and neointima formation 28days after injury in C57BL/6 mice, while simultaneously impairing re-endothelialization. Interestingly, in vitro, sirolimus had no direct effect on the proliferation of SMC or endothelial cells (EC) at serum concentrations observed after systemic application. In contrast, sirolimus reduced the adhesion of leukocytes (CD45+) and bone marrow-derived progenitor cells (CD34+) to activated EC by down-regulating the adhesion molecules ICAM-1 and VCAM-1. In addition, sirolimus treatment also significantly reduced the upregulation of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 and the recruitment of monocytic cells (MOMA-2+) in neointimal lesions in vivo.
CONCLUSION: Our findings show that systemic sirolimus treatment effectively prevents SMC and EC proliferation in vivo without directly affecting these cells. Instead, sirolimus prevents neointima formation and re-endothelialization by attenuating the inflammatory response after injury with secondary effects on SMC and EC proliferation. Thus, despite a similar net effect, the mechanisms of systemic sirolimus treatment are largely different from the local effects achieved after application of sirolimus-eluting stents.