Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026
Enhanced detection of bladder cancer using combined circulating tumor cells, urine-derived epithelial cells, and molecular biomarkers.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jiang Zhijie, Yuan Cheng, Yuan Honggang, Qin Chengchen, Li Yanqing, Hu Yuanyuan, Sun Changsheng, Deng Jiangping, Deng Feng, Li Chunyan, Li Xin, Zheng Jianjun, Luo Xingguang, Pan Xinghua, Yan Kejun, Deng Glenn
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The sensitivity of bladder cancer detection using a single biomarker from single sample type is limited. This study aimed to investigate whether a combined approach utilizing multiple biomarkers from different clinical samples could improve detection sensitivity.
METHODS: A total of 85 patients with bladder cancer and 30 healthy individuals were enrolled in this study. Urine and blood samples were collected for the isolation of urine-derived epithelial cells (UDECs) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs). These cells were then analyzed via PD-L1 assay and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) targeting chromosomes 7 and 8. In parallel, matched urine samples from patients underwent conventional urine exfoliation cytology testing (UEC). All data were analyzed in conjunction with pathological information using specialized statistical software.
RESULTS: Analysis of CTCs demonstrated a significantly higher bladder cancer detection rate (78.6%) compared to UEC (36.7%). The combination of UDEC-FISH and CTC analysis utilizing urine and blood samples achieved a higher detection rate (94.1%) than the combination of UDEC-FISH with UEC performed on the same urine sample (79.8%). Furthermore, combined analysis of three markers of CTC, UEC, and UDEC-FISH (96.5%) or CTC, UEC, and UDEC-PD-L1 (90.6%) yielded significantly higher detection rates than any single biomarker analysis alone.
CONCLUSION: Integrating multiple biomarkers from distinct sample types significantly enhances the detection sensitivity for bladder cancer.
METHODS: A total of 85 patients with bladder cancer and 30 healthy individuals were enrolled in this study. Urine and blood samples were collected for the isolation of urine-derived epithelial cells (UDECs) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs). These cells were then analyzed via PD-L1 assay and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) targeting chromosomes 7 and 8. In parallel, matched urine samples from patients underwent conventional urine exfoliation cytology testing (UEC). All data were analyzed in conjunction with pathological information using specialized statistical software.
RESULTS: Analysis of CTCs demonstrated a significantly higher bladder cancer detection rate (78.6%) compared to UEC (36.7%). The combination of UDEC-FISH and CTC analysis utilizing urine and blood samples achieved a higher detection rate (94.1%) than the combination of UDEC-FISH with UEC performed on the same urine sample (79.8%). Furthermore, combined analysis of three markers of CTC, UEC, and UDEC-FISH (96.5%) or CTC, UEC, and UDEC-PD-L1 (90.6%) yielded significantly higher detection rates than any single biomarker analysis alone.
CONCLUSION: Integrating multiple biomarkers from distinct sample types significantly enhances the detection sensitivity for bladder cancer.