Health science reports · 2025
Evaluation of the Outcomes and Complications of Uterine Artery Embolization Using the GELFOAM Technique in Patients With Ectopic Pregnancy Located in the Cervix and Ectopic Pregnancies Resulting From Previous Cesarean Section.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hemmati Hossein, Darkhaneh Roya Faraji, Khaligh Dargahi Mohaddseh, Farzin Mohaya, Sharifnia Sara, Kenarsari Habib Eslami, Souri Zoubin
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To evaluate outcomes and adverse events of uterine artery embolization (UAE) using the GELFOAM technique for cervical and cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies at a single tertiary center.
METHODS: We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional case series over 1 year. Maternal age, β-hCG levels, mass size, obstetric history, complications, and treatment success were abstracted from records. Descriptive statistics are presented as mean ± SD for approximately normally distributed variables and median (IQR) for skewed variables.
RESULTS: Among 41 patients, uterine preservation was achieved in 40 (97.6%), with no procedure-specific complications and one non-specific postoperative hematoma (2.4%). The single failure occurred in a delayed presentation and required further surgical intervention. For uterine preservation (40/41), the 95% confidence interval for the success proportion is 87.4%-99.6% (Wilson).
CONCLUSION: UAE with GELFOAM appears to be an effective, fertility-preserving option for cervical and cesarean-scar ectopic pregnancy in selected patients. Larger studies with longer follow-up are warranted.
METHODS: We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional case series over 1 year. Maternal age, β-hCG levels, mass size, obstetric history, complications, and treatment success were abstracted from records. Descriptive statistics are presented as mean ± SD for approximately normally distributed variables and median (IQR) for skewed variables.
RESULTS: Among 41 patients, uterine preservation was achieved in 40 (97.6%), with no procedure-specific complications and one non-specific postoperative hematoma (2.4%). The single failure occurred in a delayed presentation and required further surgical intervention. For uterine preservation (40/41), the 95% confidence interval for the success proportion is 87.4%-99.6% (Wilson).
CONCLUSION: UAE with GELFOAM appears to be an effective, fertility-preserving option for cervical and cesarean-scar ectopic pregnancy in selected patients. Larger studies with longer follow-up are warranted.