Consensus recommendations on perioperative mechanical ventilation strategies: an evidence-based guideline by the Brazilian Society of Anesthesiology.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Silva-Jr João Manoel, Pereira Talison Silas, Falcão Luiz Fernando Dos Reis, Treml Ricardo Esper, Isola Alexandre Marini, Pustilnik Alexandre Goulart, de Alcântara Anacleto Gabriel, Schmidt André Prato, Brandão Antonio Carlos Aguiar, de Morais Arthur Caus, Klauck Bruna Silveira Ferreira, Sily Bruno Campostrini, Tonelotto Bruno Francisco de Freitas, Silva Carlos Gustavo Dos Santos, Barbas Carmen Sílvia Valente, Simões Claudia Marquez, Sousa Daniel da Escóssia Melo, Hohmann Fábio Barlem, Regatieri Fábio Luis Ferrari, Medeiros Germano Pinheiro, Borborema Gutenberg Diniz, Araújo Maisa Ribeiro, Fernandes Marcelo Ramalho, Carlucci Marcelo Tabary de Oliveira, Vane Matheus Faccini, de Oliveira Neymar Elias, Leal Plínio da Cunha, Vieira Roberta Figueiredo, Alves Rodrigo Leal, André Rodrigo Pereira Diaz, Silveira Saullo Queiroz, de Almeida Victor Sampaio, Quintão Vinícius Caldeira, Braz Leandro Gobbo, Malbouisson Luiz Marcelo Sá
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To develop evidence-based recommendations on perioperative mechanical ventilation strategies for surgical patients, aiming to optimize respiratory care, reduce PPCs, and standardize practice in Brazil.
METHODS: This guideline was developed under the coordination of the Brazilian Society of Anesthesiology (SBA) by a panel of anesthesiologists and intensivists from multiple institutions. Seventeen clinical questions were structured in the PICO format (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome). Systematic literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus up to July 2025. The strength of recommendations and certainty of evidence were assessed using the GRADE methodology. A modified Delphi process was applied to obtain agreement among collaborators, and consensus was discussed only when the predefined threshold of at least 80% agreement was not achieved. All recommendations were standardized in a uniform format.
RESULTS: Seventeen thematic chapters were developed, covering topics from respiratory physiology and the definition of PPCs to advanced intraoperative monitoring, special populations (obese, pediatric, thoracic and cardiac surgery), and patients with or without acute lung injury. Key recommendations include the routine use of lung-protective strategies low tidal volumes of 6-8 mL.kg⁻¹ PBW in patients without ARDS and 4-8 mL.kg⁻¹ PBW in patients with ARDS, Positive End-Expiratory Pressure [PEEP] titrated to physiology, driving pressure ΔP ≤ 15 cm H2O, and Plateau Pressure [Pplat] ≤ 30 cm H2O), individualized approaches in high-risk patients, avoidance of unnecessary high fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), and selective use of recruitment maneuvers. Standardized definitions of PPCs and structured monitoring were emphasized as essential to improving patient outcomes.
CONCLUSION: These consensus-based recommendations provide clinicians with a practical, evidence-informed framework for perioperative mechanical ventilation. Adoption of protective strategies and standardized definitions is expected to improve respiratory outcomes and reduce variability in perioperative care.