The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2012
Tethering symmetry reflects advanced left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation undergoing restrictive mitral valve repair.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
van Garsse Leen, Gelsomino Sandro, Cheriex Emile, Lucà Fabiana, Rao Carmelo Massimiliano, Parise Orlando, Gensini Gian Franco, Maessen Jos
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the papillary muscle systolic dyssynchrony (DYS-PAP) using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) in patients with chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation (CIMR) showing different preoperative leaflet pattern and investigated the impact of baseline tethering pattern in the prediction of significant post-repair desynchronized papillary muscle contraction.
METHODS: We recruited 152 CIMR consecutive patients (64.4% male, mean age 65.9 ± 7.1 years) who survived coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and (undersized mitral ring annuloplasty, performed between 2001and 2010. The assessment of DYS-PAP was performed preoperatively and at follow-up (median 41.5 months [IQR 23-61]) by 2D-STE in the apical 4-chamber view for anterolateral papillary muscle and apical long-axis view for posteromedial papillary muscle). Based on the cutoff value (anterior-posterior tethering angle ratio α/β ≥ 0.76) patients were classified in 2 groups; symmetrical (group 1, n = 73, mean α/β = 0.81 ± 0.6) and asymmetrical preoperative tethering pattern (group 2, n = 79, mean α/β = 0.66 ± 0.4).
RESULTS: Recurrent MR occurred in 67.1% (n = 49) in group 1 versus 3.8% (n = 3) in group 2 (p < 0.001). Comparing both groups at baseline, patients in group 1 had higher DYS-PAP (57.7 ± 5.3 vs 29.8 ± 2.4 ms in group 2, p < 0.001) that significantly worsened at follow-up (78.1 ± 8.8 ms, p < 0.001 versus baseline), whereas in group 2 it improved (26.6 ± 6.0 ms, p < 0.001 versus baseline). Tethering symmetry significantly correlated with DYS-PAP (r = 0.90, p < 0.001) and it was a strong multivariable predictor of significant postoperative DYS-PAP (odds ratio 4.2; 95% confidence level 3.4 to 5.2, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Tethering symmetry is an easy and immediate tool to identify CIMR patients with advanced DYS-PAP who are unlikely to benefit from mitral repair with undersized mitral ring annuloplasty.
METHODS: We recruited 152 CIMR consecutive patients (64.4% male, mean age 65.9 ± 7.1 years) who survived coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and (undersized mitral ring annuloplasty, performed between 2001and 2010. The assessment of DYS-PAP was performed preoperatively and at follow-up (median 41.5 months [IQR 23-61]) by 2D-STE in the apical 4-chamber view for anterolateral papillary muscle and apical long-axis view for posteromedial papillary muscle). Based on the cutoff value (anterior-posterior tethering angle ratio α/β ≥ 0.76) patients were classified in 2 groups; symmetrical (group 1, n = 73, mean α/β = 0.81 ± 0.6) and asymmetrical preoperative tethering pattern (group 2, n = 79, mean α/β = 0.66 ± 0.4).
RESULTS: Recurrent MR occurred in 67.1% (n = 49) in group 1 versus 3.8% (n = 3) in group 2 (p < 0.001). Comparing both groups at baseline, patients in group 1 had higher DYS-PAP (57.7 ± 5.3 vs 29.8 ± 2.4 ms in group 2, p < 0.001) that significantly worsened at follow-up (78.1 ± 8.8 ms, p < 0.001 versus baseline), whereas in group 2 it improved (26.6 ± 6.0 ms, p < 0.001 versus baseline). Tethering symmetry significantly correlated with DYS-PAP (r = 0.90, p < 0.001) and it was a strong multivariable predictor of significant postoperative DYS-PAP (odds ratio 4.2; 95% confidence level 3.4 to 5.2, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Tethering symmetry is an easy and immediate tool to identify CIMR patients with advanced DYS-PAP who are unlikely to benefit from mitral repair with undersized mitral ring annuloplasty.