Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses · 2026
Relationship between dyspnoea and respiratory drive in mechanically ventilated patients: A prospective observational study.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hatozaki Chie, Sakuramoto Hideaki, Aikawa Gen, Kobayashi Shunsuke, Hoshino Tetsuya, Inoue Yoshiaki
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Patients with high respiratory drive during mechanical ventilation (MV) may be at risk for ventilator-induced lung injury, making control crucial. While high respiratory drive is often associated with dyspnoea, the relationship remains unclear.
OBJECTIVES: We examined the relationship between three dyspnoea-rating scales and respiratory drive, as measured by airway occlusion pressure (P0.1), in patients receiving MV.
METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted in the intensive care unit between February 2020 and March 2022. Adults (aged ≥20 years) expected to require MV for over 24 h were included. Dyspnoea was assessed using the Respiratory Distress Observation Scale, Intensive Care-Respiratory Distress Observation Scale, and Mechanical Ventilation-Respiratory Distress Observation Scale. Respiratory drive was measured using P0.1. Measurements were taken at up to two time points between intensive care unit admission and day 4 by two independent investigators blinded to each other's data. Pearson's correlation coefficients were used to assess relationships between dyspnoea scales and P0.1.
RESULTS: Of the 253 eligible patients, 131 were included, and 69 underwent P0.1 measurement. A total of 105 observation points were analysed. Weak negative correlations were found between the Respiratory Distress Observation Scale, Intensive Care-Respiratory Distress Observation Scale, and Mechanical Ventilation-Respiratory Distress Observation Scale and P0.1 (r = -0.293, p = 0.003; r = -0.240, p = 0.014; and r = -0.260, p = 0.008, respectively). Stratified analysis by baseline disease, severity, and sedation showed weak negative correlations only in the deep sedation group (r = -0.347, p = 0.020; r = -0.325, p = 0.029; and r = -0.352, p = 0.018, respectively), stronger than in the overall cohort. No significant correlations were found among groups stratified by disease or severity.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with MV, weak negative correlations were observed between dyspnoea assessed with the three scales and respiratory drive measured by P0.1.
OBJECTIVES: We examined the relationship between three dyspnoea-rating scales and respiratory drive, as measured by airway occlusion pressure (P0.1), in patients receiving MV.
METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted in the intensive care unit between February 2020 and March 2022. Adults (aged ≥20 years) expected to require MV for over 24 h were included. Dyspnoea was assessed using the Respiratory Distress Observation Scale, Intensive Care-Respiratory Distress Observation Scale, and Mechanical Ventilation-Respiratory Distress Observation Scale. Respiratory drive was measured using P0.1. Measurements were taken at up to two time points between intensive care unit admission and day 4 by two independent investigators blinded to each other's data. Pearson's correlation coefficients were used to assess relationships between dyspnoea scales and P0.1.
RESULTS: Of the 253 eligible patients, 131 were included, and 69 underwent P0.1 measurement. A total of 105 observation points were analysed. Weak negative correlations were found between the Respiratory Distress Observation Scale, Intensive Care-Respiratory Distress Observation Scale, and Mechanical Ventilation-Respiratory Distress Observation Scale and P0.1 (r = -0.293, p = 0.003; r = -0.240, p = 0.014; and r = -0.260, p = 0.008, respectively). Stratified analysis by baseline disease, severity, and sedation showed weak negative correlations only in the deep sedation group (r = -0.347, p = 0.020; r = -0.325, p = 0.029; and r = -0.352, p = 0.018, respectively), stronger than in the overall cohort. No significant correlations were found among groups stratified by disease or severity.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with MV, weak negative correlations were observed between dyspnoea assessed with the three scales and respiratory drive measured by P0.1.