Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons · 2021
The effect of posterior tibial and sural nerve blocks on postoperative pain of patients following open reduction and internal fixation of calcaneal fractures.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Farbood Arash, Asadi Saman, Amini Afshin, Hamze Moghaddam Bita, Asmarian Naeimehossadat, Naderi Boldaji Vida, Vosoughi Amir Reza
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Postoperative pain control and achieving opioid-free anesthesia are major issues for surgically treated patients with calcaneal fractures. We evaluated the potential role of posterior tibial and sural nerve blocks as a part of multimodal pain control techniques in patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of calcaneal fractures via extensile lateral approach.
METHODS: Forty-eight patients randomly allocated to receive either posterior tibial and sural nerve blocks with bupivacaine (peripheral nerve block (PNB) group) or normal saline, after induction of general anesthesia. Patients were assessed for pain intensity, Interval from entrance to the recovery room to the first request for analgesic, recovery room and ward morphine consumption, global satisfaction and morphine side effects.
RESULTS: PNB group had less pain score compared to sham block (SB) group at each time point measurement during recovery room stay. There was also significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the pain scores after 2, 4 and 6 h of the operation in the ward. Time to the first request for analgesic was significantly prolonged in the PNB group (P < 0.001). The recovery room and ward morphine consumption was significantly lower in the PNB group (P < 0.001). Global satisfaction in PNB group was significantly more than that of SB group. No complication related to the nerve block was detected at the first postoperative visit in the outpatient clinic.
CONCLUSION: Peripheral nerve block could result in less postoperative pain especially in the early hours after ORIF of calcaneal fractures and reduce opioid administration within the first 24 h following the surgery.
METHODS: Forty-eight patients randomly allocated to receive either posterior tibial and sural nerve blocks with bupivacaine (peripheral nerve block (PNB) group) or normal saline, after induction of general anesthesia. Patients were assessed for pain intensity, Interval from entrance to the recovery room to the first request for analgesic, recovery room and ward morphine consumption, global satisfaction and morphine side effects.
RESULTS: PNB group had less pain score compared to sham block (SB) group at each time point measurement during recovery room stay. There was also significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the pain scores after 2, 4 and 6 h of the operation in the ward. Time to the first request for analgesic was significantly prolonged in the PNB group (P < 0.001). The recovery room and ward morphine consumption was significantly lower in the PNB group (P < 0.001). Global satisfaction in PNB group was significantly more than that of SB group. No complication related to the nerve block was detected at the first postoperative visit in the outpatient clinic.
CONCLUSION: Peripheral nerve block could result in less postoperative pain especially in the early hours after ORIF of calcaneal fractures and reduce opioid administration within the first 24 h following the surgery.