MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1590/s1677-55382008000200007

Медицинская библиотека · International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology · 2008

Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in persistent hemospermia.

Prando Adilson

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To present the spectrum of abnormalities found at endorectal magnetic resonance imaging (E-MRI), in patients with persistent hemospermia.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A review of E-MRI findings observed in 86 patients with persistent hemospermia was performed and results compared with those reported in the literature. Follow-up was possible in 37 of 86 (43%) patients with hemospermia.

RESULTS

E-MRI showed abnormal findings in 52 of 86 (60%) patients with hemospermia. These findings were: a) hemorrhagic seminal vesicle and ejaculatory duct, isolated (n = 11 or 21%) or associated with complicated midline prostatic cyst (n = 10 or 19.0%); b) hemorrhagic chronic seminal vesiculitis, isolated (n = 14 or 27%) or associated with calculi within dilated ejaculatory ducts (n = 2 or 4 %); c) hemorrhagic seminal vesicle associated with calculi within dilated ejaculatory duct (n = 4 or 7.7%) or within seminal vesicle (n = 4 or 7.7%); d) non-complicated midline prostatic cyst (n = 6 or 11.5%); and e) prostate cancer (n = 1 or 2%). Successful treatment was more frequent in patients with chronic inflammatory and/or obstructive abnormalities.

CONCLUSION

E-MRI should be considered the modality of choice, for the evaluation of patients with persistent hemospermia.

Для цитирования: Prando Adilson. Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in persistent hemospermia.. International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. 2008. DOI: 10.1590/s1677-55382008000200007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.