Comparative Effectiveness of Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors in Heart Failure With Nonreduced Ejection Fraction: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

BackgroundThe comparative effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) versus angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in heart failure with nonreduced ejection fraction (HFnon-rEF) remains uncertain. We evaluated long-term outcomes of these therapies in a real-world cohort following hospitalization for acute heart failure.MethodsThis retrospective multicenter study (2005-2019) included 5837 patients with HFnon-rEF (left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 40%). Patients were categorized by discharge prescription into ACEi, ARB, or non-renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASi) groups. A 14-day landmark approach ensured pharmacological stabilization and reduced time-related bias. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance covariates (SMD < 0.1). The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular (CV) death or heart failure rehospitalization at 1 year.ResultsThe primary composite outcome was similar between ARB and ACEi users (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-1.17; P = .556). However, ARB therapy was associated with lower all-cause mortality compared with ACEi (adjusted HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.55-0.99; P = .041) and non-RASi (adjusted HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67-0.94; P = .008). Subgroup analyses showed generally consistent directional associations between ARB use and lower mortality, although these findings were exploratory.ConclusionsIn this real-world cohort of patients with HFnon-rEF, ARB use was associated with lower all-cause mortality compared with ACEi, despite similar CV outcomes. These findings do not establish superiority and should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating.