MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.07.004

Медицинская библиотека · Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease · 2018

The effect of rapid diagnostic testing with Infectious Diseases fellow consultative intervention on the management of enterococcal bloodstream infection.

Gray Megan E, Cox Heather L, Donohue Lindsay E, Poulter Melinda D, Eby Joshua C, Mathers Amy J

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Rapid diagnostics for enterococcal bloodstream infections (E-BSIs) can decrease the time to speciation and determination of vancomycin resistance but may not lead to improved antibiotic stewardship.

METHODS

Over 3 years, the time to administration of institutionally preferred antibiotics (IPT) for patients with E-BSI was evaluated and compared between 3 intervention groups: before (baseline) and after implementation of a rapid diagnostic (BC-GP), and the use of BC-GP with an Infectious Diseases (ID) fellow-driven consultative intervention (BC-GP + ID).

RESULTS

A total of 110 patients (63 baseline, 13 BC-GP, 34 BC-GP + ID) with E-BSI were evaluated. Evaluation of Enterococcus faecium BSI showed that the time IPT was significantly reduced with BC-GP + ID by 10.6 h from baseline (P = 0.02) and 5.4 h from BC-GP (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

An ID fellow-driven stewardship intervention was associated with a significant improvement in time to IPT for patients with E. faecium but not E. faecalis BSI.

Для цитирования: Gray Megan E, Cox Heather L, Donohue Lindsay E, Poulter Melinda D, Eby Joshua C, Mathers Amy J. The effect of rapid diagnostic testing with Infectious Diseases fellow consultative intervention on the management of enterococcal bloodstream infection.. Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.07.004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.