MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1997.00133.x

Медицинская библиотека · British journal of urology · 1997

The ice-water test in the diagnosis and treatment of the neurogenic bladder.

Ronzoni G, Menchinelli P, Manca A, De Giovanni L

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To determine the usefulness of the ice-water test (IWT) in the diagnosis and treatment of neurological bladder disease.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

The IWT was carried out in 148 patients with neuropathic bladder dysfunction resulting from a traumatic lesion, to assist in their diagnosis and treatment, and in 130 patients with neuropathic bladder dysfunction and multiple pathogenic disorders; the results of the IWT were used to classify those patients with hyperactive bladders.

RESULTS

The IWT was positive in 95% of patients affected by complete and in 86% of patients with incomplete medullary lesions. The IWT in patients with lower motor neuron medullary lesions was always negative. The test was used diagnostically in all patients with lower and in 43% of those with upper motor neuron lesions. In the latter, it was used in 48% of patients as a rehabilitation method during the medullary-shock phase to accelerate the appearance of the micturition reflex. In 9% of patients it was used to induce micturition during cystography.

CONCLUSION

Because it is simple to perform, the IWT is a useful complement to urodynamic examinations in patients with neurological bladder disease and in patients with micturitional disorders that are otherwise difficult to interpret.

Для цитирования: Ronzoni G, Menchinelli P, Manca A, De Giovanni L. The ice-water test in the diagnosis and treatment of the neurogenic bladder.. British journal of urology. 1997. DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1997.00133.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.