Journal of perinatal medicine · 2009
Predictors of severe perineal lacerations in Chinese women.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schwartz Nadav, Seubert David E, Mierlak Julian, Arslan Alan A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Chinese women have been shown to have a higher incidence of severe perineal laceration compared to other ethnic groups. We sought to test the hypothesis that this risk is related to body mass index (BMI) or to a relative fetal-maternal size disproportion as measured by the ratio of the newborn birthweight to maternal BMI (BW:BMI).
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using a pre-existing obstetric database. Third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations served as the primary outcome of interest. Logistic regression was used to compare Chinese women to other ethnic groups and adjust for confounders.
RESULTS: Three thousand and eighty-five singleton vaginal deliveries were identified, with BMI data available for 2281. Chinese women had a greater risk for severe perineal laceration compared to Caucasian (OR: 3.22; 95% CI: 0.73-14.32) and Hispanic women (OR: 2.88; 95% CI: 1.92-4.30). Multivariate analysis found that newborn birth weight plays a role (OR: 1.0012; 95% CI: 1.0007-1.0016), but BMI alone did not explain the discrepancy (P=0.89). However, the BW:BMI ratio appears to be a stronger predictor of laceration rate than either variable alone (OR: 1.011; 95% CI: 1.003-1.020).
CONCLUSION: The higher risk of severe perineal laceration in Chinese women compared to other ethnicities can be attributed, in part, to a relative fetal-maternal size disproportion.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using a pre-existing obstetric database. Third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations served as the primary outcome of interest. Logistic regression was used to compare Chinese women to other ethnic groups and adjust for confounders.
RESULTS: Three thousand and eighty-five singleton vaginal deliveries were identified, with BMI data available for 2281. Chinese women had a greater risk for severe perineal laceration compared to Caucasian (OR: 3.22; 95% CI: 0.73-14.32) and Hispanic women (OR: 2.88; 95% CI: 1.92-4.30). Multivariate analysis found that newborn birth weight plays a role (OR: 1.0012; 95% CI: 1.0007-1.0016), but BMI alone did not explain the discrepancy (P=0.89). However, the BW:BMI ratio appears to be a stronger predictor of laceration rate than either variable alone (OR: 1.011; 95% CI: 1.003-1.020).
CONCLUSION: The higher risk of severe perineal laceration in Chinese women compared to other ethnicities can be attributed, in part, to a relative fetal-maternal size disproportion.