MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01961.x

Медицинская библиотека · BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2008

A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery.

Macleod M, Strachan B, Bahl R, Howarth L, Goyder K, Van de Venne M, Murphy D J

Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the maternal and neonatal morbidity of operative vaginal delivery in relation to the use of episiotomy.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Two urban maternity units in Scotland and England.

POPULATION: All nonrandomised nulliparous women delivered by forceps or vacuum during the recruitment period of a clinical trial evaluating the use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery.

METHODS

Use of episiotomy was compared to no episiotomy for all operative vaginal deliveries with sub-group analyses for forceps or vacuum deliveries.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was anal sphincter tearing (third or fourth degree). Secondary outcomes included postpartum haemorrhage, neonatal trauma and pelvic floor symptoms up until 10 days postpartum.

RESULTS

A total of 1360 women were included in the study, of whom 294 (21.6%) did not receive an episiotomy. Vacuum delivery was associated with less use of episiotomy than forceps (56.1 versus 89.4%, OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.11-0.20). Anal sphincter tear rates were not statistically different with use of episiotomy compared with no episiotomy (9.9 versus 7.1%, adjusted OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.66-1.87). Episiotomy use was associated with higher rates of postpartum haemorrhage (28.5 versus 18.4%, adjusted OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.21-2.45), need for moderate or strong analgesia (90.5 versus 67.6%, adjusted OR 3.70, 95% CI 2.60-5.27), perineal infection (5.1 versus 1.4%, adjusted OR 4.04, 95% CI 1.44-11.37) and neonatal trauma (38.1 versus 22.0%, adjusted OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.20-2.27). Use of episiotomy did not reduce the risk of shoulder dystocia (3.5 versus 1.7%, adjusted OR 1.42, 95% CI 0.53-3.85).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of episiotomy did not reduce or greatly increase anal sphincter tears and was associated with greater maternal and neonatal morbidity. This may reflect the complexity of deliveries. The role of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery should be evaluated in a randomised controlled trial.

Для цитирования: Macleod M, Strachan B, Bahl R, Howarth L, Goyder K, Van de Venne M, Murphy D J. A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery.. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2008. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01961.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.