Journal of pediatric urology · 2024
Development of a prototype of a patient-reported outcomes measure for hypospadias care, the Patient Assessment Tool for Hypospadias (PATH).
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Brown Charlene, Larson Kristen, Cockrum Brandon, Hawryluk Bridget, Moore Courtney M, Wiehe Sarah E, Chan Katherine H
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for hypospadias care are lacking, and most existing instruments were developed without patient input.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to 1) use our previously developed Hypospadias Journal for concept elicitation in a sample of adolescent and young adult hypospadias patients and 2) develop a new hypospadias PROM.
STUDY DESIGN: We recruited English-speaking males ages 13-30 living in the United States with a self-reported history of hypospadias through targeted advertisements on Facebook and Instagram from March to June 2022. Using a Qualtrics screening survey ineligible respondents were identified using automated fraud detection and manual review. Consenting participants were sent an electronic Hypospadias Journal containing brief creative writing exercises and multiple-choice scales to facilitate participant reflections about genital appearance, urination, sexual function, and psychosocial well-being. Demographics were summarized using descriptive statistics. Human-centered design researchers synthesized the journals' key themes to 1) create an affinity diagram with hypospadias-related quality of life (QOL) domains and 2) draft items for the PROM covering each domain and sub-domain. Journal participants were asked to complete a survey to 1) rank hypospadias QOL domains, subdomains, and draft items for the PROM, and 2) explore their preferences for item phrasing. In a small group virtual interview, a urologist and a hypospadias patient reviewed and revised draft PROM items, and a final PROM was created.
RESULTS: Of the 411 completed screening surveys, 391 were ineligible. Journals were sent to 20 eligible participants. Of these, 12 completed journals: 8 adults; 4 adolescents (11 surgical/1 non-surgical): 66.7% White, 8.3% Black, 16.7% Asian, 8.3% >1 race. The meatal location was distal for 41.7%, proximal for 41.7%, unknown/missing for 16.7%. We identified four hypospadias-related quality-of-life domains and 13 respective sub-domains (Extended Summary Figure) of these, two were novel domains: 1) knowledge about the condition/treatment and comfort with treatment decision, and 2) impact on relationships with caregivers, medical providers, and sexual partners. A final PROM prototype, the Patient Assessment Tool for Hypospadias (PATH) was created, covering all QOL domains identified by participants.
DISCUSSION: We created a simple, brief hypospadias PROM to screen for salient topics to be addressed by providers in the clinical setting. Limitations include the small sample size and limited clinical details about participants.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides a hypospadias PROM that is ready for psychometric assessment in a larger sample.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to 1) use our previously developed Hypospadias Journal for concept elicitation in a sample of adolescent and young adult hypospadias patients and 2) develop a new hypospadias PROM.
STUDY DESIGN: We recruited English-speaking males ages 13-30 living in the United States with a self-reported history of hypospadias through targeted advertisements on Facebook and Instagram from March to June 2022. Using a Qualtrics screening survey ineligible respondents were identified using automated fraud detection and manual review. Consenting participants were sent an electronic Hypospadias Journal containing brief creative writing exercises and multiple-choice scales to facilitate participant reflections about genital appearance, urination, sexual function, and psychosocial well-being. Demographics were summarized using descriptive statistics. Human-centered design researchers synthesized the journals' key themes to 1) create an affinity diagram with hypospadias-related quality of life (QOL) domains and 2) draft items for the PROM covering each domain and sub-domain. Journal participants were asked to complete a survey to 1) rank hypospadias QOL domains, subdomains, and draft items for the PROM, and 2) explore their preferences for item phrasing. In a small group virtual interview, a urologist and a hypospadias patient reviewed and revised draft PROM items, and a final PROM was created.
RESULTS: Of the 411 completed screening surveys, 391 were ineligible. Journals were sent to 20 eligible participants. Of these, 12 completed journals: 8 adults; 4 adolescents (11 surgical/1 non-surgical): 66.7% White, 8.3% Black, 16.7% Asian, 8.3% >1 race. The meatal location was distal for 41.7%, proximal for 41.7%, unknown/missing for 16.7%. We identified four hypospadias-related quality-of-life domains and 13 respective sub-domains (Extended Summary Figure) of these, two were novel domains: 1) knowledge about the condition/treatment and comfort with treatment decision, and 2) impact on relationships with caregivers, medical providers, and sexual partners. A final PROM prototype, the Patient Assessment Tool for Hypospadias (PATH) was created, covering all QOL domains identified by participants.
DISCUSSION: We created a simple, brief hypospadias PROM to screen for salient topics to be addressed by providers in the clinical setting. Limitations include the small sample size and limited clinical details about participants.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides a hypospadias PROM that is ready for psychometric assessment in a larger sample.