MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/pap.0000000000000510

Медицинская библиотека · Advances in anatomic pathology · 2025

The Dublin International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Best Practice Recommendations on the Pathology of Glandular Lesions of the Urinary Bladder.

Paner Gladell P, Al-Ahmadie Hikmat, Gaisa Nadine T, Lopez-Beltran Antonio, Maclean Fiona, Tsuzuki Toyonori, Werneck da Cunha Isabela, Amin Mahul B, Aning Jonathan, Aron Manju, Athanazio Daniel, Bambury Richard M, Cheng Liang, Gopalan Anuradha, Gulmann Christian, Guo Charles C, Harris Carole, Iyer Gopa, Jimenez Rafael E, Jinzaki Masahiro, Kikuchi Eiji, Lal Priti, Miyai Kosuke, Netto George J, Pan Chin-Chen, Panebianco Valeria, van Rhijn Bas Wg, Siefker-Radtke Arlene, Smith Steven C, Szarvas Tibor, Wobker Sara E, Kristiansen Glen, Reis Henning, ISUP Expert Panel On Urachal Neoplasms and Urinary Bladder Glandular Lesions

Consensus StatementСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The Dublin ISUP Consensus Conference covered the proceedings on the best practice recommendations on nonurachal glandular lesions of the urinary bladder, bladder diverticular cancers, and molecular features of bladder and urachal glandular lesions. The conference proceedings on urachal neoplasms (except for their molecular features) are published elsewhere. The rationale for convening this conference was the lack of structured and consented pathologic recommendations in these rare lesions. Consensus by participants was reached on the following statements: (1) intestinal metaplasia with dysplasia is considered to be a precursor to primary bladder adenocarcinoma; (2) dysplasia arising from cystitis glandularis should be reported in terms of focality (focal or nonfocal) and grade (low or high); (3) the term "adenocarcinoma" should only be used for carcinomas showing pure (nonurothelial) morphology and should not be used interchangeably in urothelial carcinoma with "glandular differentiation" because of the pathobiological differences and management implications; (4) the different histologic subtypes of bladder adenocarcinoma should be specified in the report; (5) immunohistochemistry has an ancillary role in the work up of bladder adenocarcinoma versus gastrointestinal or Müllerian-type adenocarcinomas; (6) lymphovascular invasion should be included as a parameter when reporting bladder adenocarcinoma; (7) representative or targeted sampling will be sufficient for bladder diverticulum resection specimens; and (8) molecular analysis in genomic profiling should be performed only in advanced or metastatic bladder and urachal adenocarcinomas for targetable therapy. This report on glandular (nonurachal) lesions of the bladder from the Dublin ISUP consensus conference will serve as a best practice recommendation and as a guide for future research on these relatively rare lesions.

Для цитирования: Paner Gladell P, Al-Ahmadie Hikmat, Gaisa Nadine T, Lopez-Beltran Antonio, Maclean Fiona, Tsuzuki Toyonori, Werneck da Cunha Isabela, Amin Mahul B, Aning Jonathan, Aron Manju, Athanazio Daniel, Bambury Richard M, Cheng Liang, Gopalan Anuradha, Gulmann Christian, Guo Charles C, Harris Carole, Iyer Gopa, Jimenez Rafael E, Jinzaki Masahiro, Kikuchi Eiji, Lal Priti, Miyai Kosuke, Netto George J, Pan Chin-Chen, Panebianco Valeria, van Rhijn Bas Wg, Siefker-Radtke Arlene, Smith Steven C, Szarvas Tibor, Wobker Sara E, Kristiansen Glen, Reis Henning, ISUP Expert Panel On Urachal Neoplasms and Urinary Bladder Glandular Lesions. The Dublin International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Best Practice Recommendations on the Pathology of Glandular Lesions of the Urinary Bladder.. Advances in anatomic pathology. 2025. DOI: 10.1097/pap.0000000000000510.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.