Investigative radiology · 1995
Use of fibrinolytic agents to coat wire implants to decrease infection. An animal model.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nakamoto D A, Haaga J R, Bove P, Merritt K, Rowland D Y
Аннотация
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Infection is a serious complication of metallic prosthesis implantation and may necessitate removal of the prosthesis. This study uses an animal model to evaluate the effects of coating stainless steel wire implants with fibrinolytic agents to prevent infection after bacterial contamination.
METHODS: Three types of steel wire implants were used: plain stainless steel, heparin-coated steel, and urokinase-heparin-coated steel. Wire implants were incubated in a known concentration of Staphylococcus epidermidis and placed into the subcutaneous tissues of three groups of anesthetized hamsters. The implants and surrounding tissues were excised after 1 week and submitted for quantitative cultures.
RESULTS: Using 100 organisms as the upper allowable limit to categorize abscesses as noninfected, the following rates of noninfectivity were observed: group 1 (control), 0% noninfected; group 2 (heparin-coated wire), 40% noninfected; and group 3 (urokinase-heparin-coated wire), 50% noninfected. The noninfectivity rates of groups 2 and 3 were significantly higher than the rate of group 1 (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between groups 2 and 3 (P = 0.19).
CONCLUSIONS: Both the heparin-coated and urokinase-heparin-coated wire exhibited significantly decreased infection rates compared with uncoated wire; the heparin coating may inhibit bacterial adherence. The urokinase coating of the heparin-coated wire appears to further decrease the infection rate, but not to a statistically significant degree.
METHODS: Three types of steel wire implants were used: plain stainless steel, heparin-coated steel, and urokinase-heparin-coated steel. Wire implants were incubated in a known concentration of Staphylococcus epidermidis and placed into the subcutaneous tissues of three groups of anesthetized hamsters. The implants and surrounding tissues were excised after 1 week and submitted for quantitative cultures.
RESULTS: Using 100 organisms as the upper allowable limit to categorize abscesses as noninfected, the following rates of noninfectivity were observed: group 1 (control), 0% noninfected; group 2 (heparin-coated wire), 40% noninfected; and group 3 (urokinase-heparin-coated wire), 50% noninfected. The noninfectivity rates of groups 2 and 3 were significantly higher than the rate of group 1 (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between groups 2 and 3 (P = 0.19).
CONCLUSIONS: Both the heparin-coated and urokinase-heparin-coated wire exhibited significantly decreased infection rates compared with uncoated wire; the heparin coating may inhibit bacterial adherence. The urokinase coating of the heparin-coated wire appears to further decrease the infection rate, but not to a statistically significant degree.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AbscessAnimalsBacterial AdhesionBone WiresColony Count, MicrobialConnective TissueCricetinaeDermatologic Surgical ProceduresDisease Models, AnimalEquipment ContaminationFibrinolytic AgentsHeparinPlasminogen ActivatorsProstheses and ImplantsProsthesis-Related InfectionsStainless SteelStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus epidermidisSurface PropertiesUrokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator