MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/1471-0528.16472

Медицинская библиотека · BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2020

Effect of single- versus double-layer uterine closure during caesarean section on postmenstrual spotting (2Close): multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial.

Stegwee S I, van der Voet L F, Ben A J, de Leeuw R A, van de Ven P M, Duijnhoven R G, Bongers M Y, Lambalk C B, de Groot Cjm, Huirne Jaf, 2Close study group

Equivalence TrialСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether double-layer uterine closure after a first caesarean section (CS) is superior compared with single-layer uterine closure in terms of postmenstrual spotting and niche development in the uterine caesarean scar.

DESIGN

Multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial.

SETTING

Thirty-two hospitals in the Netherlands.

POPULATION: A total of 2292 women aged ≥18 years undergoing a first CS were randomly assigned to each procedure (1:1): 1144 women were assigned to single-layer uterine closure and 1148 women were assigned to double-layer uterine closure.

METHODS

Single-layer unlocked closure and double-layer unlocked closure, with the second layer imbricating the first.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of days with postmenstrual spotting during one menstrual cycle 9 months after CS.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES: perioperative and menstrual characteristics; transvaginal ultrasound measurements.

RESULTS

A total of 774 (67.7%) women from the single-layer group and 770 (67.1%) women from the double-layer group were evaluable for the primary outcome, as a result of drop-out and amenorrhoea. The mean number of postmenstrual spotting days was 1.33 (bootstrapped 95% CI 1.12-1.54) after single-layer closure and 1.26 (bootstrapped 95% CI 1.07-1.45) after double-layer closure (adjusted mean difference -0.07, 95% CI -0.37 to 0.22, P = 0.810). The operative time was 3.9 minutes longer (95% CI 3.0-4.9 minutes, P < 0.001) and niche prevalence was 4.7% higher (95% CI 0.7-8.7%, P = 0.022) after double-layer closure.

CONCLUSIONS

The superiority of double-layer closure compared with single-layer closure in terms of postmenstrual spotting after a first CS was not shown. Long-term obstetric follow-up of our trial is needed to assess whether uterine caesarean closure guidelines should be adapted.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Double-layer uterine closure is not superior for postmenstrual spotting after a first caesarean; single-layer closure performs slightly better on other outcomes.

Для цитирования: Stegwee S I, van der Voet L F, Ben A J, de Leeuw R A, van de Ven P M, Duijnhoven R G, Bongers M Y, Lambalk C B, de Groot Cjm, Huirne Jaf, 2Close study group. Effect of single- versus double-layer uterine closure during caesarean section on postmenstrual spotting (2Close): multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial.. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2020. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16472.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.