MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bmjsit-2023-000251

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies · 2024

Clinical effectiveness of a modified muscle sparing posterior technique compared with a standard lateral approach in hip hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fractures (HemiSPAIRE): a multicenter, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial.

Ball Susan, Aylward Alex, Cockcroft Emma, Corr Aisling, Gordon Elizabeth, Kerridge Alison, McAndrew Amy, Morgan-Trimmer Sarah, Powell Roy, Price Anna, Rhodes Shelley, Timperley Andrew John, van Horik Jayden, Wickins Robert, Charity John

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Assess the effect of a modified muscle sparing posterior approach; SPAIRE (Save Piriformis and Internus, Repairing Externus), in hip hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fractures on postoperative mobility and function compared with a standard lateral approach.

DESIGN

Pragmatic, superiority, multicenter, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial (with internal pilot). Participants, ward staff, and research staff conducting postoperative assessments were blinded to allocation. A CTU allocated treatments centrally using computer-generated lists.

SETTING

Six hospitals in Southwest England, recruiting November 25, 2019-April 25, 2022.

PARTICIPANTS

244 adults (≥60 years) requiring hip hemiarthroplasty (122 allocated to each approach). 90 and 85 participants allocated to SPAIRE and lateral, respectively, had primary outcome data within the prespecified data collection window.

INTERVENTIONS: Surgery using SPAIRE or standard lateral approach. Follow-up 3 days and 120 days postoperation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Oxford Hip Score (OHS), via telephone at 120 days. Secondary outcomes: function and mobility (3 days), pain (3 days, 120 days), discharge destination, length of hospital stay, complications and mortality (within 120 days), quality of life and place of residence (120 days).

RESULTS

Participants' mean age was 84.6 years (SD 7.2); 168 (69%) were women. Primary outcome: little evidence of a difference in OHS at 120 days; adjusted mean difference (SPAIRE-lateral) -1.23 (95% CI -3.96 to 1.49, p=0.37). Secondary outcomes: indication of lower participant-reported pain at 3 days in SPAIRE arm; no differences between arms for remaining outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants' mobility and function are similar in the short term (3 days) and longer term (120 days), whether receiving the SPAIRE or lateral approach. Neither approach confers benefit over the other in terms of length of hospital stay, return to prefracture residence, survival within 120 days, or quality of life at 120 days. Participants receiving SPAIRE approach may experience less pain in the early postoperative period. Modifying the posterior approach in hip hemiarthroplasty to the SPAIRE approach gives equivalent patient outcomes to the lateral approach within 120 days.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04095611.

Для цитирования: Ball Susan, Aylward Alex, Cockcroft Emma, Corr Aisling, Gordon Elizabeth, Kerridge Alison, McAndrew Amy, Morgan-Trimmer Sarah, Powell Roy, Price Anna, Rhodes Shelley, Timperley Andrew John, van Horik Jayden, Wickins Robert, Charity John. Clinical effectiveness of a modified muscle sparing posterior technique compared with a standard lateral approach in hip hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fractures (HemiSPAIRE): a multicenter, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial.. BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies. 2024. DOI: 10.1136/bmjsit-2023-000251.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.