Sulfonamide resistance, virulence traits, and in-silico target interactions among clinical isolates in Setif, Algeria (2021-2023).
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVES
Antibiotic-resistant bacteria are a growing global health concern, particularly in developing regions. Sulfonamides, once widely used, now face increasing resistance. This study assessed the prevalence, resistance profiles, and virulences traites of sulfonamide-resistant strains in Sétif, Algeria (2021-2023).
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
A total of 215 clinical isolates were collected from patients aged 1 day to 96 years (mean 42.7). Most were community-acquired (77.2%), with urinary tract infections predominating (49.3% in women, 32.1% in men). Identification and susceptibility testing followed standard microbiological and Kirby-Bauer methods. Virulence factors (biofilm, hemolysin, protease, lecithinase, and lipase) were examined. Molecular docking compared sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim binding to their enzymatic targets.
RESULTS
Escherichia coli was the most frequent isolate (47.9%), followed by Enterobacter spp. (11.6%). Biofilm formation was common (88.8%), with complete production in Klebsiella, Citrobacter, Providencia, and Acinetobacter. Hemolysis patterns were α (30.7%), β (27.9%), and none (41.4%). Enzymatic activity included protease (48.8%), lecithinase (22.8%), and lipase (9.8%). High resistance was observed to penicillins (87.9%), cephalosporins (63.7%), and fluoroquinolones (56.3%). Resistance was lower to imipenem (33.0%) and amikacin (14.4%). Docking showed weaker sulfamethoxazole binding to DHPS than trimethoprim to DHFR.
CONCLUSION
The high prevalence of multidrug-resistant bacteria, especially E. coli, combined with biofilm and enzyme production, underscores the urgent need for careful antibiotic stewardship in this region.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.