A prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing tibial nailing using fracture table traction versus manual traction.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the effectiveness of intramedullary tibial nailing using manual traction with the leg draped free versus standard fracture table positioning and traction.

STUDY

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized clinical trial.

METHODS

Eighty-five tibial shaft fractures (in seventy-nine patients) treated by intramedullary nailing were randomized either to manual traction with the leg draped free or to standard fracture table traction applied through a boot attachment.

RESULTS

We found that manual traction provided results, in terms of intraoperative parameters and quality of fracture reduction, similar to those with standard fracture table traction. Manual traction significantly reduced positioning time (twelve minutes versus twenty-five minutes, p = 0.002) and also allowed for multiple simultaneous or sequential procedures in polytrauma patients without the need for re-positioning or re-draping. This saved a further thirty-two minutes (mean) in 37 percent of cases treated by manual traction.

CONCLUSION

Manual traction for intramedullary nailing of the tibia is an effective technique that can save a significant amount of time without sacrificing the quality of reduction or fixation of tibial shaft fractures. It is especially useful in polytrauma patients with multiple lower-extremity injuries.