MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fped.2026.1800421

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026

Abusive head trauma: a consensus statement on a shared workflow model within the Balkan network for quality improvement in forensic medicine.

Concato Monica, Franzoni Maximo Leonardo, Petrović Tijana, Galic Anita, Srpanova Viktorija Belakaposka, Dervisevic Emina, Spiliopoulou Chara, D'Errico Stefano

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Abusive head trauma (AHT), is considered a leading cause of fatalities resulting from physical abuse in infants under 2 years of age, with a peak incidence between 1 and 2 months after birth. The incidence of AHT ranges from 14 to approximately 40 cases per 100,000 children in industrialized countries with a mortality rate ranging from 10 to 20%. The absence of internationally recognized best practices or guidelines especially in the field of forensic medicine has resulted in methodological variability in the management of these cases across different settings. In response to this gap, a comparative working group involving experts from Italy and the Balkan countries was established, leading to the creation of a shared discussion platform. The aim of this collaborative effort was to identify strengths and critical issues in the forensic handling of abusive head trauma, ultimately with the goal of developing a shared workflow chart for the management of these complex cases within the network.

Для цитирования: Concato Monica, Franzoni Maximo Leonardo, Petrović Tijana, Galic Anita, Srpanova Viktorija Belakaposka, Dervisevic Emina, Spiliopoulou Chara, D'Errico Stefano. Abusive head trauma: a consensus statement on a shared workflow model within the Balkan network for quality improvement in forensic medicine.. Frontiers in pediatrics. 2026. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2026.1800421.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.