DOI 10.1007/s11033-026-12278-9
Cellular effects of combined Ctn-2 peptide and doxorubicin treatment in breast cancer cells: A preliminary study of membrane interaction, ROS production, and cell cycle distribution.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) lacks targeted therapies and is commonly treated with doxorubicin, whose efficacy is limited by toxicity and chemoresistance. Bioactive peptides have emerged as potential adjuvants due to their membrane activity and antitumor properties. To address the potential of the combined treatment, we explored the cellular effects and underlying mechanisms of Ctn-2 peptide and doxorubicin in TNBC cells.
METHODS AND
RESULTS
MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with Ctn-2 (15 µM), doxorubicin (1.25-5 µM), and their combination. Membrane interactions were evaluated using FTIR spectroscopy in model lipid systems. Intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) were measured by DCFDA fluorescence, and cell cycle distribution was analyzed by DNA content. FTIR analysis suggested peptide-membrane interactions in tumor-like lipid systems. Ctn-2 alone did not significantly affect ROS production or cell cycle distribution. Doxorubicin induced a dose-dependent increase in ROS and cell death. The combined treatment enhanced cell death, as evidenced by an increased sub-G1 population, without further increasing ROS levels or inducing phase-specific cell cycle arrest.
CONCLUSIONS
The effect of the combined treatment appears to be associated with increased cell death rather than ROS accumulation or cell cycle arrest. Membrane perturbation induced by Ctn-2 may contribute to this effect by facilitating doxorubicin activity. Although preliminary, these findings suggest the potential of peptide-based combination strategies in TNBC and warrant further mechanistic investigation.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.