Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine · 2025
Examination of risk appraisal during the return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Palmsten Allison, Niemuth Elizabeth, Gunderson Travis C, Aberman Rick, Sikorski Jonathon, Benitez Gabriela Vazquez, Chmielewski Terese L
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To describe features of risk appraisal after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).
STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis.
METHODS: 161 patients with ACLR, cleared to initiate return to sport, were tested (initial and follow-up 6 weeks later). Patient characteristics, ACL-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) score and limb symmetry index (LSI) on 4 single-leg hop tests were collected. ACL-RSI confidence domain and scores on risk appraisal items (#2: reinjure knee, #10: surgery/rehabilitation; both with respect to playing sports) were calculated. Risk appraisal items were analyzed for: change over time using effect sizes; correlations with age, sex, confidence domain score, and hop LSIs; and differences based on meeting readiness-for-sport criteria (ACL-RSI ≥70, hop LSIs ≥90 %).
RESULTS: Risk appraisal item scores increased at follow-up (δ = 0.22, 0.26); higher scores were correlated with younger age (ρ = -0.25, -0.39), higher confidence domain score (ρ = 0.67, 0.60) and higher timed hop LSI (ρ = 0.24, 0.27). Patients meeting ACL-RSI/hop LSI or ACL-RSI criteria had significantly higher risk appraisal item scores than those meeting hop LSI or no criteria (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Risk appraisal may evolve following ACLR. Patients with high confidence, and those exhibiting psychological readiness alone or in combination with physical readiness, tend to perceive lower risk with returning to sport.
STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis.
METHODS: 161 patients with ACLR, cleared to initiate return to sport, were tested (initial and follow-up 6 weeks later). Patient characteristics, ACL-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) score and limb symmetry index (LSI) on 4 single-leg hop tests were collected. ACL-RSI confidence domain and scores on risk appraisal items (#2: reinjure knee, #10: surgery/rehabilitation; both with respect to playing sports) were calculated. Risk appraisal items were analyzed for: change over time using effect sizes; correlations with age, sex, confidence domain score, and hop LSIs; and differences based on meeting readiness-for-sport criteria (ACL-RSI ≥70, hop LSIs ≥90 %).
RESULTS: Risk appraisal item scores increased at follow-up (δ = 0.22, 0.26); higher scores were correlated with younger age (ρ = -0.25, -0.39), higher confidence domain score (ρ = 0.67, 0.60) and higher timed hop LSI (ρ = 0.24, 0.27). Patients meeting ACL-RSI/hop LSI or ACL-RSI criteria had significantly higher risk appraisal item scores than those meeting hop LSI or no criteria (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Risk appraisal may evolve following ACLR. Patients with high confidence, and those exhibiting psychological readiness alone or in combination with physical readiness, tend to perceive lower risk with returning to sport.