The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2008
Tissue versus mechanical prostheses: quality of life in octogenarians.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vicchio Mariano, Della Corte Alessandro, De Santo Luca Salvatore, De Feo Marisa, Caianiello Giuseppe, Scardone Michelangelo, Cotrufo Maurizio
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether changes in prognosis and quality of life (QOL) after aortic valve replacement (AVR) in octogenarians differ depending on the choice of mechanical (MP) or tissue (BP) valves.
METHODS: Between July 1992 and September 2006, 160 consecutive octogenarians underwent AVR with (18.8%) or without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting. At follow-up (mean 3.4 +/- 2.8 years, 552 patient-years, 98.3% complete), 121 were still alive and answered the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) QOL questionnaire.
RESULTS: Group BP had 62 patients. Group MP had 98 patients. Preoperative risk factors were comparable except group BP was older. Global hospital mortality was 8.8%. There were 21 late deaths, 61.9% of which were not valve- or anticoagulation-related. A significant difference emerged in 1-, 3-, 5- and 8-year actuarial survival rates (BP: 86.4% +/- 0.04%, 76.9% +/- 0.06%, 58.1% +/- 0.1%, 46.5% +/- 0.14%, respectively, vs MP: 91.3% +/- 0.03%, 88.6% +/- 0.03%, 81.6% +/- 0.05%, 70% +/- 0.67%; p = 0.025) but not in terms of 8-year freedom from valve-related complications (82.6% +/- 0.1% vs 87% +/- 0.053%, p = 0.55). One anticoagulant-related hemorrhage occurred in group MP; one stroke occurred in group BP. Survivors had significant improvement in New York Heart Association functional class compared with preoperatively (1.1 vs 2.8, p < 0.001) Mean QOL scores were satisfactory and substantially comparable between the two groups; in seven domains, scores were higher than those of the age- and sex-matched general Italian population.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival after AVR in selected octogenarians was similar to that of the general elderly population. The device type exerted no influence on QOL.
METHODS: Between July 1992 and September 2006, 160 consecutive octogenarians underwent AVR with (18.8%) or without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting. At follow-up (mean 3.4 +/- 2.8 years, 552 patient-years, 98.3% complete), 121 were still alive and answered the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) QOL questionnaire.
RESULTS: Group BP had 62 patients. Group MP had 98 patients. Preoperative risk factors were comparable except group BP was older. Global hospital mortality was 8.8%. There were 21 late deaths, 61.9% of which were not valve- or anticoagulation-related. A significant difference emerged in 1-, 3-, 5- and 8-year actuarial survival rates (BP: 86.4% +/- 0.04%, 76.9% +/- 0.06%, 58.1% +/- 0.1%, 46.5% +/- 0.14%, respectively, vs MP: 91.3% +/- 0.03%, 88.6% +/- 0.03%, 81.6% +/- 0.05%, 70% +/- 0.67%; p = 0.025) but not in terms of 8-year freedom from valve-related complications (82.6% +/- 0.1% vs 87% +/- 0.053%, p = 0.55). One anticoagulant-related hemorrhage occurred in group MP; one stroke occurred in group BP. Survivors had significant improvement in New York Heart Association functional class compared with preoperatively (1.1 vs 2.8, p < 0.001) Mean QOL scores were satisfactory and substantially comparable between the two groups; in seven domains, scores were higher than those of the age- and sex-matched general Italian population.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival after AVR in selected octogenarians was similar to that of the general elderly population. The device type exerted no influence on QOL.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Aged, 80 and overAortic Valve StenosisBioprosthesisCohort StudiesEchocardiography, DopplerFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGeriatric AssessmentHeart Valve ProsthesisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationHumansMalePostoperative CareProbabilityProsthesis DesignQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentSensitivity and SpecificitySeverity of Illness IndexSurvival AnalysisTreatment Outcome