Sexual dysfunctions in patients with well-compensated chronic liver disease: role of etiology, Mediterranean diet and quality of life in an observational cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND

Sexual dysfunctions (SD) are highly prevalent in Chronic Liver Diseases (CLD). Whether Metabolic dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) carries a higher risk of SD is unknown as is the role of dietary patterns or quality of Life (QoL).

AIM: to assess (1) prevalence of SD in CLD; (2) whether MASLD is a risk factor for SD; (3) the role of adherence to Mediterranean Diet (MD) or QoL.

METHODS

Observational, cross-sectional study, 207 CLD patients (84 females and 123 males), median age 57 years (IQR:46-63); 96 (46.4%) MASLD; and 111 (53.6%) nonMASLD.

OUTCOMES: SD were assessed through Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaires. Adherence to MD was evaluated by the MD Score, QoL by SFHS-12 questionnaire evaluating physical [(ie, Physical Component Summary (PCS)] and mental [(ie, Mental Component Summary (MCS)] health. Multivariate analysis identified predictors of SD.

RESULTS

(1) SD prevalence in CLD was 157/207 (75.8%); 80.9% females were at risk for SD, altered sexual desire/arousal and dyspareunia being the most common complaints, whereas 72.3% males had erectile dysfunction (ED); (2) prevalence of SD was higher in MASLD (89%) than in nonMASLD (64%) (P < 0.001); (3) in females, at univariate analysis, a negative correlation was found between FSFI and age, hypertension, or MASLD; (4) in males, at univariate analysis, IIEF-ED negatively correlated with age, DM2, or MASLD, whereas positively correlated with PCS and MCS; (5) in females, at multivariate analysis BMI (OR = 0.779,CI 95% = 0.640-0.948) and MCS (OR = 0.840,CI 95% = 0.741-0.953) were protective against SD, whereas age (OR = 1.115,CI 95% = 1.040-1.263) and DM2 (OR = 120.894,CI 95% = 1.396-10 741) were predictive of SD; (6) in males, at multivariate analysis, age (OR = 1088,CI 95% = 1032-1.148) and MASLD (OR = 4.075,CI 95% = 1.120-14.828) were risk factors for, whereas PCS (OR = 0,928,CI 95% = 0,865-0,995), and disease duration (OR = 0.393,CI 95% = 0.187-0.822) were protective against SD; 7) MD adherence, while higher in nonMASLD vs MASLD (P = 0.004), was not an independent protective factor against SD.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: SD should not be underestimated in CLD patients, in particular those with MASLD.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Comprehensive study evaluating SD in a large cohort of CLD patients of both sexes, comparing MASLD vs nonMASLD. Due to its cross-sectional design, no conclusions can be drawn about cause and effect.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) CLD, in particular MASLD, have a high prevalence of SD which is not affected by MD adherence, whereas QoL seems to play a role; (2) CLD patients should be evaluated for SD, for early diagnosis and treatment.