The functional outcome of forty-nine single-incision suture anchor repairs for distal biceps tendon ruptures at the elbow.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the functional results of distal biceps tendon repair using suture anchors via a single-incision approach.
METHODS
Forty-nine patients were re-examined at a mean follow-up of 44.2 ± 32.1 months (range, 12-119 months). Subjective and objective criteria included patient's satisfaction, active range of motion (ROM), maximum isometric strength in flexion (at 45° and 90°), and supination of both arms. Functional scoring included the Morrey elbow score (MES) and the QuickDASH. Furthermore, follow-up radiographs were performed.
RESULTS
Eighty-six percent of patients were highly satisfied or satisfied with their outcome. Compared to contralateral, the active ROM of elbow flexion, extension, and pronation was not affected; however, supination was decreased by 3° (P < 0.001). The isometric maximum strengths showed significant deficits in all tested scenarios (at 45°, P = 0.002; at 90°, P < 0.001; for supination, P < 0.001). The MES and the QuickDASH were 97.2 ± 4.9 and 7.9 ± 13.9, respectively. Heterotopic ossifications (HO) were found in 39% of patients; however, with respect to scores and strength, no significant differences were seen compared to patients without HO. Moreover, four anchor failures were detected.
CONCLUSIONS
Single-incision suture anchor repair provides high patient's satisfaction and good results with respect to ROM and functional scoring. Nevertheless, based on presented data, the patient has to be informed of postoperative HO and especially for supination strength weakness after surgery. Distal biceps tendon repair should be reserved for experienced upper extremity surgeons to avoid procedure-related complications.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.