Kidney international reports · 2022
Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Telitacicept in Patients With IgA Nephropathy With Persistent Proteinuria.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lv Jicheng, Liu Lijun, Hao Chuanming, Li Guisen, Fu Ping, Xing Guangqun, Zheng Hongguang, Chen Nan, Wang Caili, Luo Ping, Xie Deqiong, Zuo Li, Li Rongshan, Mao Yonghui, Dong Shaoshao, Zhang Pengfei, Zheng Huixiao, Wang Yue, Qin Wei, Wang Wenxiang, Li Lin, Jiao Wenjuan, Fang Jianmin, Zhang Hong
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: To date, no specific therapies have been approved for immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) treatment. Telitacicept is a fusion protein composed of transmembrane activator and calcium-modulating cyclophilin ligand interactor and fragment crystallizable portion of immunoglobulin G (IgG), which neutralizes the B lymphocyte stimulator and a proliferation-inducing ligand.
METHODS: This phase 2 randomized placebo-controlled trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of telitacicept in patients with IgAN. Participants with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >35 ml/min per 1.73 m2 and proteinuria ≥0.75 g/d despite optimal supportive therapy, were randomized 1:1:1 to receive subcutaneous telitacicept 160 mg, telitacicept 240 mg, or placebo weekly for 24 weeks. The primary end point was the change in 24-hour proteinuria at week 24 from baseline.
RESULTS: Forty-four participants were randomized into placebo (n = 14), telitacicept 160 mg (n = 16), and telitacicept 240 mg (n = 14) groups. Continuous reductions in serum IgA, IgG, and IgM levels were observed in the telitacicept group. Telitacicept 240 mg therapy reduced mean proteinuria by 49% from baseline (change in proteinuria vs. placebo, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, -1.57 to -0.20; P = 0.013), whereas telitacicept 160 mg reduced it by 25% (-0.29; 95% confidence interval, -0.95 to 0.37; P = 0.389). The eGFR remained stable over time. Adverse events (AEs) were similar in all groups. Treatment-emergent AEs were mild or moderate, and no severe AEs were reported.
CONCLUSION: Telitacicept treatment led to a clinically meaningful reduction in proteinuria in patients with IgAN in the present phase 2 clinical trial. This effect is indicative of a reduced risk for future kidney disease progression.
METHODS: This phase 2 randomized placebo-controlled trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of telitacicept in patients with IgAN. Participants with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >35 ml/min per 1.73 m2 and proteinuria ≥0.75 g/d despite optimal supportive therapy, were randomized 1:1:1 to receive subcutaneous telitacicept 160 mg, telitacicept 240 mg, or placebo weekly for 24 weeks. The primary end point was the change in 24-hour proteinuria at week 24 from baseline.
RESULTS: Forty-four participants were randomized into placebo (n = 14), telitacicept 160 mg (n = 16), and telitacicept 240 mg (n = 14) groups. Continuous reductions in serum IgA, IgG, and IgM levels were observed in the telitacicept group. Telitacicept 240 mg therapy reduced mean proteinuria by 49% from baseline (change in proteinuria vs. placebo, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, -1.57 to -0.20; P = 0.013), whereas telitacicept 160 mg reduced it by 25% (-0.29; 95% confidence interval, -0.95 to 0.37; P = 0.389). The eGFR remained stable over time. Adverse events (AEs) were similar in all groups. Treatment-emergent AEs were mild or moderate, and no severe AEs were reported.
CONCLUSION: Telitacicept treatment led to a clinically meaningful reduction in proteinuria in patients with IgAN in the present phase 2 clinical trial. This effect is indicative of a reduced risk for future kidney disease progression.