MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i11.2201

Медицинская библиотека · World journal of clinical cases · 2020

Choice and management of negative pressure drainage in anterior cervical surgery.

Su Qi-Hang, Zhu Kai, Li Yong-Chao, Chen Tao, Zhang Yan, Tan Jun, Guo Song

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Postoperative unobstructed drainage is an important measure for avoiding hematoma formation and preventing complications from anterior cervical surgery.

AIM: To discuss the characteristics and key points of clinical management of two types of commonly used negative pressure drainage systems in clinical settings.

METHODS

Two types of commonly used silica gel negative pressure drainage balls and a type of gastrointestinal decompression apparatus were fully emptied and then injected with different amounts of water and air. Following this, the negative pressure values of the three devices were measured. Meanwhile, we undertook a retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 1328 patients who had been treated with different negative pressure drainage apparatuses during their anterior cervical surgery in our department between January 2007 and January 2018.

RESULTS

As the amount of injected air or water increased, the negative pressure of the silica gel negative pressure drainage ball decreased rapidly, dropping to zero when 150 mL of water or air was injected. In contrast, the negative pressure of gastrointestinal decompression apparatus decreased slowly, maintaining an ideal value even when 300 mL of water or air was injected. And statistical analysis demonstrated that patients who had been treated with the gastrointestinal decompression apparatus were less likely to develop severe complications than those who had been treated with the silica gel negative pressure drainage ball (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that the gastrointestinal decompression apparatus has the advantages of large suction capacity, long duration of continuous negative pressure, and good drainage effect, all of which are the favorable factors for the use of this apparatus for negative pressure drainage in anterior cervical surgery.

Для цитирования: Su Qi-Hang, Zhu Kai, Li Yong-Chao, Chen Tao, Zhang Yan, Tan Jun, Guo Song. Choice and management of negative pressure drainage in anterior cervical surgery.. World journal of clinical cases. 2020. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i11.2201.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.