MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000351857

Медицинская библиотека · Fetal diagnosis and therapy · 2013

Paternity balancing.

Evans Mark I, Andriole Stephanie, Pergament Eugene, Speer Jamie, Curtis Jenifer, Britt David W

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Gestational carriers and egg donors have been used by 'traditional' and now increasingly, gay couples. Three gay male couples, all using egg donors and gestational carriers with semen from both partners, had triplets. All desired reductions to twins for the standard medical indications, but requested, if reasonably possible, to have twins with one fathered by each partner.

METHODS

Following our usual clinical protocol, we performed chorionic villus sampling at 12 weeks on all fetuses obtaining FISH and karyotype. For paternity analysis, 14 polymorphic molecular markers on villi were compared to DNA samples from the two men to include or exclude each.

RESULTS

Standard assessments were all normal. Paternity testing showed that one partner fathered two of the triplets, and the other one. In all cases, one of the 'twins' was reduced with good clinical outcomes ensuing.

CONCLUSIONS

Paternity balancing increases options for satisfying family planning desires of gay male couples. We believe it comparable to gender preferences in reductions, i.e. it can be considered but only completely subservient to any clinical criteria. Paternity balancing raises similar ethical issues as reduction with gender preferences, but may increase patient autonomy and mainstream acceptance of stable, gay families.

Для цитирования: Evans Mark I, Andriole Stephanie, Pergament Eugene, Speer Jamie, Curtis Jenifer, Britt David W. Paternity balancing.. Fetal diagnosis and therapy. 2013. DOI: 10.1159/000351857.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.